Loading…
WR Efficiency Leaderboard
The most efficient WRs by PPR per snap — points produced per opportunity.
ProxyPPR per snap, not FP per route run.tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate a route denominator — offensive snaps stand in (points produced per opportunity, independent of playing time). Values run lower than per-route benchmarks; the bands are our own field.
As-of weekAs of Week 12, 2025Point-in-time: aggregates Weeks 1–12 only.
Efficiency bandsElite≥ 0.40Strong≥ 0.35Solid≥ 0.30Rotational< 0.30PPR per snap · from our 2023–25 qualified-WR field
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
| # | Player | PPR/snap | PPR/g | Tgt% | Snaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Jaxon Smith-NjigbaWR SEA | 0.516Elite | 23.2 | 39% | 494 |
| 2 |  Puka NacuaWR LAR | 0.471Elite | 21.0 | 29% | 446 |
| 3 |  Rashee RiceWR KC | 0.398Strong | 20.2 | 26% | 254 |
| 4 |  DeMario DouglasWR NE | 0.368Strong | 6.7 | — | 219 |
| 5 |  George PickensWR DAL | 0.350Strong | 20.0 | 24% | 630 |
| 6 |  Amon-Ra St. BrownWR DET | 0.350Strong | 19.8 | 32% | 623 |
| 7 |  Tyreek HillWR MIA | 0.345Solid | 13.4 | 25% | 155 |
| 8 |  Davante AdamsWRLAR | 0.344Solid | 16.6 | 26% | 533 |
| 9 |  Stefon DiggsWRNE | 0.337Solid | 12.2 | — | 436 |
| 10 |  Keenan AllenWR LAC | 0.335Solid | 12.7 | — | 416 |
| 11 |  Ja'Marr ChaseWR CIN | 0.328Solid | 19.4 | 33% | 591 |
| 12 |  Drake LondonWR ATL | 0.325Solid | 19.7 | 33% | 545 |
| 13 |  Deebo SamuelWR WSH | 0.309Solid | 14.1 | 26% | 457 |
| 14 |  Luke McCaffreyWRWSH | 0.295Rotational | 5.7 | — | 174 |
| 15 |  Jaylen WaddleWRMIA | 0.291Rotational | 13.8 | 24% | 520 |
| 16 |  Khalil ShakirWR BUF | 0.291Rotational | 11.5 | — | 436 |
| 17 |  CeeDee LambWRDAL | 0.284Rotational | 14.9 | 26% | 421 |
| 18 |  Luther Burden IIIWR CHI | 0.284Rotational | 6.0 | — | 210 |
| 19 |  Nico CollinsWR HOU | 0.282Rotational | 14.7 | 25% | 519 |
| 20 |  John Metchie IIIWR NYJ | 0.280Rotational | 3.8 | — | 137 |
| 21 |  Michael Pittman Jr.WR IND | 0.276Rotational | 14.9 | — | 593 |
| 22 |  Chris OlaveWR NO | 0.273Rotational | 14.9 | 29% | 602 |
| 23 |  Troy FranklinWR DEN | 0.271Rotational | 12.0 | — | 486 |
| 24 |  Hollywood BrownWRKC | 0.269Rotational | 9.7 | — | 398 |
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.516Elite
- PPR per game
- 23.2
- Target share
- 39%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 494
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.471Elite
- PPR per game
- 21.0
- Target share
- 29%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 446
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.398Strong
- PPR per game
- 20.2
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 254
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.368Strong
- PPR per game
- 6.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 219
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.350Strong
- PPR per game
- 20.0
- Target share
- 24%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 630
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.350Strong
- PPR per game
- 19.8
- Target share
- 32%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 623
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.345Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.4
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 155
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.344Solid
- PPR per game
- 16.6
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 533
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.337Solid
- PPR per game
- 12.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 436
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.335Solid
- PPR per game
- 12.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 416
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.328Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.4
- Target share
- 33%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 591
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.325Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.7
- Target share
- 33%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 545
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.309Solid
- PPR per game
- 14.1
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 457
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.295Rotational
- PPR per game
- 5.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 174
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.291Rotational
- PPR per game
- 13.8
- Target share
- 24%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 520
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.291Rotational
- PPR per game
- 11.5
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 436
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.284Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.9
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 421
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.284Rotational
- PPR per game
- 6.0
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 210
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.282Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.7
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 519
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.280Rotational
- PPR per game
- 3.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 137
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.276Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.9
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 593
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.273Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.9
- Target share
- 29%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 602
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.271Rotational
- PPR per game
- 12.0
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 486
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.269Rotational
- PPR per game
- 9.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 398
PPR per snap is our sanctioned proxy for FP per route run. tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate it — offensive snaps are the in-house denominator (per opportunity, independent of playing time). Because snaps include non-route plays, these values run lower than the per-route benchmarks @FantasyPtsData posts (Tyreek 0.85, Puka 0.75 FP/route) — different denominator, not comparable. Bands are our own 2023–25 WR distribution. Historical, descriptive — not a projection. How it works →