Loading…
WR Efficiency Leaderboard
The most efficient WRs by PPR per snap — points produced per opportunity.
ProxyPPR per snap, not FP per route run.tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate a route denominator — offensive snaps stand in (points produced per opportunity, independent of playing time). Values run lower than per-route benchmarks; the bands are our own field.
As-of weekAs of Week 8, 2024Point-in-time: aggregates Weeks 1–8 only.
Efficiency bandsElite≥ 0.40Strong≥ 0.35Solid≥ 0.30Rotational< 0.30PPR per snap · from our 2023–25 qualified-WR field
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
| # | Player | PPR/snap | PPR/g | Tgt% | Snaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Nico CollinsWR HOU | 0.441Elite | 21.3 | 25% | 242 |
| 2 |  Rashee RiceWR KC | 0.419Elite | 16.2 | 25% | 155 |
| 3 |  Cooper KuppWR LAR | 0.380Strong | 18.6 | 30% | 147 |
| 4 |  Khalil ShakirWR BUF | 0.374Strong | 12.9 | — | 242 |
| 5 |  Ja'Marr ChaseWR CIN | 0.371Strong | 19.8 | — | 427 |
| 6 |  Brian Thomas Jr.WR JAX | 0.368Strong | 15.5 | — | 336 |
| 7 |  Kalif RaymondWR DET | 0.361Strong | 6.9 | — | 134 |
| 8 |  Justin JeffersonWR MIN | 0.359Strong | 19.4 | 34% | 379 |
| 9 |  Jauan JenningsWR SF | 0.349Solid | 13.9 | — | 239 |
| 10 |  A.J. BrownWR PHI | 0.347Solid | 19.9 | 35% | 230 |
| 11 |  Chris GodwinWR TB | 0.345Solid | 19.7 | 28% | 399 |
| 12 |  Tee HigginsWRCIN | 0.342Solid | 16.2 | 30% | 237 |
| 13 |  Josh DownsWR IND | 0.340Solid | 14.4 | 26% | 254 |
| 14 |  CeeDee LambWR DAL | 0.338Solid | 18.9 | 29% | 391 |
| 15 |  KaVontae TurpinWRDAL | 0.338Solid | 5.7 | — | 118 |
| 16 |  Jayden ReedWR GB | 0.333Solid | 14.6 | — | 350 |
| 17 |  Mike EvansWRTB | 0.316Solid | 13.6 | — | 302 |
| 18 |  Ladd McConkeyWR LAC | 0.311Solid | 13.1 | 25% | 295 |
| 19 |  Malik NabersWR NYG | 0.308Solid | 19.0 | 38% | 369 |
| 20 |  Amon-Ra St. BrownWRDET | 0.298Rotational | 16.6 | 26% | 390 |
| 21 |  Terry McLaurinWR WSH | 0.294Rotational | 15.0 | 25% | 409 |
| 22 |  Stefon DiggsWRHOU | 0.283Rotational | 15.2 | — | 431 |
| 23 |  Rashid ShaheedWR NO | 0.279Rotational | 13.3 | 25% | 286 |
| 24 |  Devaughn VeleWR DEN | 0.269Rotational | 8.1 | — | 121 |
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.441Elite
- PPR per game
- 21.3
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 242
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.419Elite
- PPR per game
- 16.2
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 155
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.380Strong
- PPR per game
- 18.6
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 147
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.374Strong
- PPR per game
- 12.9
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 242
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.371Strong
- PPR per game
- 19.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 427
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.368Strong
- PPR per game
- 15.5
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 336
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.361Strong
- PPR per game
- 6.9
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 134
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.359Strong
- PPR per game
- 19.4
- Target share
- 34%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 379
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.349Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.9
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 239
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.347Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.9
- Target share
- 35%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 230
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.345Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.7
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 399
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.342Solid
- PPR per game
- 16.2
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 237
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.340Solid
- PPR per game
- 14.4
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 254
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.338Solid
- PPR per game
- 18.9
- Target share
- 29%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 391
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.338Solid
- PPR per game
- 5.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 118
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.333Solid
- PPR per game
- 14.6
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 350
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.316Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.6
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 302
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.311Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.1
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 295
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.308Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.0
- Target share
- 38%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 369
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.298Rotational
- PPR per game
- 16.6
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 390
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.294Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.0
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 409
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.283Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 431
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.279Rotational
- PPR per game
- 13.3
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 286
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.269Rotational
- PPR per game
- 8.1
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 121
PPR per snap is our sanctioned proxy for FP per route run. tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate it — offensive snaps are the in-house denominator (per opportunity, independent of playing time). Because snaps include non-route plays, these values run lower than the per-route benchmarks @FantasyPtsData posts (Tyreek 0.85, Puka 0.75 FP/route) — different denominator, not comparable. Bands are our own 2023–25 WR distribution. Historical, descriptive — not a projection. How it works →