Loading…
WR Efficiency Leaderboard
The most efficient WRs by PPR per snap — points produced per opportunity.
ProxyPPR per snap, not FP per route run.tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate a route denominator — offensive snaps stand in (points produced per opportunity, independent of playing time). Values run lower than per-route benchmarks; the bands are our own field.
As-of weekAs of Week 5, 2024Point-in-time: aggregates Weeks 1–5 only.
Efficiency bandsElite≥ 0.40Strong≥ 0.35Solid≥ 0.30Rotational< 0.30PPR per snap · from our 2023–25 qualified-WR field
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
| # | Player | PPR/snap | PPR/g | Tgt% | Snaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Nico CollinsWR HOU | 0.441Elite | 21.3 | — | 242 |
| 2 |  Rashee RiceWR KC | 0.419Elite | 16.2 | — | 155 |
| 3 |  Jayden ReedWR GB | 0.403Elite | 18.3 | — | 227 |
| 4 |  Khalil ShakirWR BUF | 0.397Strong | 13.3 | — | 134 |
| 5 |  Ja'Marr ChaseWR CIN | 0.394Strong | 21.7 | — | 275 |
| 6 |  Jauan JenningsWR SF | 0.379Strong | 15.5 | — | 205 |
| 7 |  Cooper KuppWR LAR | 0.378Strong | 19.9 | 33% | 105 |
| 8 |  Malik NabersWR NYG | 0.375Strong | 22.9 | 40% | 244 |
| 9 |  Josh DownsWR IND | 0.373Strong | 14.4 | 29% | 116 |
| 10 |  Brian Thomas Jr.WR JAX | 0.372Strong | 16.2 | — | 218 |
| 11 |  Justin JeffersonWR MIN | 0.351Strong | 19.0 | 34% | 271 |
| 12 |  Chris GodwinWR TB | 0.346Solid | 17.8 | 28% | 257 |
| 13 |  Mike EvansWRTB | 0.343Solid | 16.1 | — | 235 |
| 14 |  Tee HigginsWRCIN | 0.328Solid | 16.1 | 28% | 147 |
| 15 |  Rashid ShaheedWR NO | 0.312Solid | 14.3 | 26% | 229 |
| 16 |  Ladd McConkeyWR LAC | 0.301Solid | 11.2 | 27% | 148 |
| 17 |  Wan'Dale RobinsonWRNYG | 0.299Rotational | 13.8 | 27% | 230 |
| 18 |  Stefon DiggsWRHOU | 0.284Rotational | 16.4 | — | 289 |
| 19 |  Drake LondonWR ATL | 0.281Rotational | 17.1 | 26% | 304 |
| 20 |  Alec PierceWRIND | 0.281Rotational | 13.6 | — | 241 |
| 21 |  Marvin Harrison Jr.WR ARI | 0.275Rotational | 13.8 | 26% | 251 |
| 22 |  Amon-Ra St. BrownWR DET | 0.273Rotational | 17.1 | 31% | 251 |
| 23 |  Xavier WorthyWRKC | 0.269Rotational | 11.6 | — | 216 |
| 24 |  CeeDee LambWR DAL | 0.266Rotational | 15.3 | — | 287 |
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.441Elite
- PPR per game
- 21.3
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 242
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.419Elite
- PPR per game
- 16.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 155
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.403Elite
- PPR per game
- 18.3
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 227
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.397Strong
- PPR per game
- 13.3
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 134
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.394Strong
- PPR per game
- 21.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 275
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.379Strong
- PPR per game
- 15.5
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 205
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.378Strong
- PPR per game
- 19.9
- Target share
- 33%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 105
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.375Strong
- PPR per game
- 22.9
- Target share
- 40%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 244
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.373Strong
- PPR per game
- 14.4
- Target share
- 29%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 116
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.372Strong
- PPR per game
- 16.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 218
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.351Strong
- PPR per game
- 19.0
- Target share
- 34%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 271
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.346Solid
- PPR per game
- 17.8
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 257
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.343Solid
- PPR per game
- 16.1
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 235
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.328Solid
- PPR per game
- 16.1
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 147
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.312Solid
- PPR per game
- 14.3
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 229
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.301Solid
- PPR per game
- 11.2
- Target share
- 27%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 148
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.299Rotational
- PPR per game
- 13.8
- Target share
- 27%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 230
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.284Rotational
- PPR per game
- 16.4
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 289
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.281Rotational
- PPR per game
- 17.1
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 304
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.281Rotational
- PPR per game
- 13.6
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 241
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.275Rotational
- PPR per game
- 13.8
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 251
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.273Rotational
- PPR per game
- 17.1
- Target share
- 31%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 251
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.269Rotational
- PPR per game
- 11.6
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 216
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.266Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.3
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 287
PPR per snap is our sanctioned proxy for FP per route run. tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate it — offensive snaps are the in-house denominator (per opportunity, independent of playing time). Because snaps include non-route plays, these values run lower than the per-route benchmarks @FantasyPtsData posts (Tyreek 0.85, Puka 0.75 FP/route) — different denominator, not comparable. Bands are our own 2023–25 WR distribution. Historical, descriptive — not a projection. How it works →