Loading…
WR Efficiency Leaderboard
The most efficient WRs by PPR per snap — points produced per opportunity.
ProxyPPR per snap, not FP per route run.tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate a route denominator — offensive snaps stand in (points produced per opportunity, independent of playing time). Values run lower than per-route benchmarks; the bands are our own field.
As-of weekAs of Week 4, 2024Point-in-time: aggregates Weeks 1–4 only.
Efficiency bandsElite≥ 0.40Strong≥ 0.35Solid≥ 0.30Rotational< 0.30PPR per snap · from our 2023–25 qualified-WR field
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
| # | Player | PPR/snap | PPR/g | Tgt% | Snaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Jauan JenningsWR SF | 0.446Elite | 18.9 | — | 169 |
| 2 |  Jayden ReedWR GB | 0.427Elite | 19.4 | — | 182 |
| 3 |  Rashee RiceWR KC | 0.419Elite | 16.2 | — | 155 |
| 4 |  Khalil ShakirWR BUF | 0.397Strong | 13.3 | — | 134 |
| 5 |  Justin JeffersonWR MIN | 0.395Strong | 19.9 | 30% | 202 |
| 6 |  Nico CollinsWR HOU | 0.390Strong | 22.7 | 29% | 233 |
| 7 |  Cooper KuppWR LAR | 0.378Strong | 19.9 | 33% | 105 |
| 8 |  Chris GodwinWR TB | 0.377Strong | 19.3 | 29% | 205 |
| 9 |  Malik NabersWR NYG | 0.375Strong | 22.9 | 40% | 244 |
| 10 |  Brian Thomas Jr.WR JAX | 0.319Solid | 14.4 | — | 181 |
| 11 |  Ja'Marr ChaseWR CIN | 0.310Solid | 16.8 | — | 216 |
| 12 |  Wan'Dale RobinsonWRNYG | 0.309Solid | 13.2 | 27% | 171 |
| 13 |  Marvin Harrison Jr.WR ARI | 0.306Solid | 15.8 | 27% | 207 |
| 14 |  Mike EvansWRTB | 0.304Solid | 14.3 | — | 189 |
| 15 |  Ladd McConkeyWR LAC | 0.301Solid | 11.2 | 27% | 148 |
| 16 |  Stefon DiggsWRHOU | 0.296Rotational | 17.0 | — | 230 |
| 17 |  CeeDee LambWR DAL | 0.294Rotational | 16.2 | — | 221 |
| 18 |  Tutu AtwellWRLAR | 0.292Rotational | 8.3 | — | 114 |
| 19 |  Deebo Samuel Sr.WRSF | 0.291Rotational | 15.6 | 29% | 161 |
| 20 |  Rashid ShaheedWR NO | 0.289Rotational | 13.2 | — | 183 |
| 21 |  Xavier WorthyWRKC | 0.289Rotational | 11.6 | — | 160 |
| 22 |  DK MetcalfWR SEA | 0.286Rotational | 17.6 | — | 247 |
| 23 |  Diontae JohnsonWR CAR | 0.279Rotational | 14.0 | 28% | 200 |
| 24 |  Amon-Ra St. BrownWR DET | 0.273Rotational | 17.1 | 31% | 251 |
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.446Elite
- PPR per game
- 18.9
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 169
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.427Elite
- PPR per game
- 19.4
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 182
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.419Elite
- PPR per game
- 16.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 155
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.397Strong
- PPR per game
- 13.3
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 134
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.395Strong
- PPR per game
- 19.9
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 202
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.390Strong
- PPR per game
- 22.7
- Target share
- 29%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 233
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.378Strong
- PPR per game
- 19.9
- Target share
- 33%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 105
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.377Strong
- PPR per game
- 19.3
- Target share
- 29%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 205
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.375Strong
- PPR per game
- 22.9
- Target share
- 40%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 244
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.319Solid
- PPR per game
- 14.4
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 181
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.310Solid
- PPR per game
- 16.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 216
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.309Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.2
- Target share
- 27%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 171
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.306Solid
- PPR per game
- 15.8
- Target share
- 27%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 207
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.304Solid
- PPR per game
- 14.3
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 189
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.301Solid
- PPR per game
- 11.2
- Target share
- 27%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 148
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.296Rotational
- PPR per game
- 17.0
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 230
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.294Rotational
- PPR per game
- 16.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 221
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.292Rotational
- PPR per game
- 8.3
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 114
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.291Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.6
- Target share
- 29%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 161
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.289Rotational
- PPR per game
- 13.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 183
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.289Rotational
- PPR per game
- 11.6
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 160
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.286Rotational
- PPR per game
- 17.6
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 247
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.279Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.0
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 200
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.273Rotational
- PPR per game
- 17.1
- Target share
- 31%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 251
PPR per snap is our sanctioned proxy for FP per route run. tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate it — offensive snaps are the in-house denominator (per opportunity, independent of playing time). Because snaps include non-route plays, these values run lower than the per-route benchmarks @FantasyPtsData posts (Tyreek 0.85, Puka 0.75 FP/route) — different denominator, not comparable. Bands are our own 2023–25 WR distribution. Historical, descriptive — not a projection. How it works →