Loading…
WR Efficiency Leaderboard
The most efficient WRs by PPR per snap — points produced per opportunity.
ProxyPPR per snap, not FP per route run.tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate a route denominator — offensive snaps stand in (points produced per opportunity, independent of playing time). Values run lower than per-route benchmarks; the bands are our own field.
As-of weekAs of Week 12, 2024Point-in-time: aggregates Weeks 1–12 only.
Efficiency bandsElite≥ 0.40Strong≥ 0.35Solid≥ 0.30Rotational< 0.30PPR per snap · from our 2023–25 qualified-WR field
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
| # | Player | PPR/snap | PPR/g | Tgt% | Snaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Nico CollinsWR HOU | 0.431Elite | 19.5 | 25% | 316 |
| 2 |  Rashee RiceWR KC | 0.419Elite | 16.2 | 25% | 155 |
| 3 |  Puka NacuaWR LAR | 0.392Strong | 15.5 | — | 238 |
| 4 |  Ja'Marr ChaseWR CIN | 0.387Strong | 22.9 | 25% | 650 |
| 5 |  Cooper KuppWRLAR | 0.372Strong | 20.1 | 30% | 379 |
| 6 |  KaVontae TurpinWR DAL | 0.366Strong | 6.0 | — | 180 |
| 7 |  Tee HigginsWRCIN | 0.362Strong | 18.5 | 30% | 306 |
| 8 |  Chris GodwinWR TB | 0.345Solid | 19.7 | 28% | 399 |
| 9 |  Josh DownsWR IND | 0.342Solid | 13.8 | 26% | 402 |
| 10 |  Khalil ShakirWR BUF | 0.336Solid | 12.8 | — | 382 |
| 11 |  Jauan JenningsWR SF | 0.333Solid | 14.9 | 26% | 402 |
| 12 |  Jayden ReedWR GB | 0.325Solid | 13.5 | — | 456 |
| 13 |  Amon-Ra St. BrownWR DET | 0.319Solid | 18.5 | 28% | 638 |
| 14 |  Mike EvansWRTB | 0.315Solid | 13.4 | — | 341 |
| 15 |  Brian Thomas Jr.WR JAX | 0.314Solid | 13.3 | — | 468 |
| 16 |  Mecole HardmanWRKC | 0.310Solid | 3.0 | — | 107 |
| 17 |  CeeDee LambWRDAL | 0.303Solid | 17.5 | 30% | 633 |
| 18 |  A.J. BrownWR PHI | 0.301Solid | 17.0 | 33% | 451 |
| 19 |  DeAndre HopkinsWRKC | 0.288Rotational | 9.3 | — | 354 |
| 20 |  Ladd McConkeyWR LAC | 0.287Rotational | 13.0 | — | 497 |
| 21 |  Terry McLaurinWR WSH | 0.285Rotational | 14.6 | — | 616 |
| 22 |  Stefon DiggsWRHOU | 0.283Rotational | 15.2 | — | 431 |
| 23 |  Rashid ShaheedWR NO | 0.279Rotational | 13.3 | 25% | 286 |
| 24 |  Justin JeffersonWR MIN | 0.277Rotational | 16.9 | 30% | 671 |
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.431Elite
- PPR per game
- 19.5
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 316
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.419Elite
- PPR per game
- 16.2
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 155
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.392Strong
- PPR per game
- 15.5
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 238
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.387Strong
- PPR per game
- 22.9
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 650
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.372Strong
- PPR per game
- 20.1
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 379
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.366Strong
- PPR per game
- 6.0
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 180
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.362Strong
- PPR per game
- 18.5
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 306
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.345Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.7
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 399
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.342Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.8
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 402
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.336Solid
- PPR per game
- 12.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 382
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.333Solid
- PPR per game
- 14.9
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 402
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.325Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.5
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 456
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.319Solid
- PPR per game
- 18.5
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 638
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.315Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.4
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 341
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.314Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.3
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 468
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.310Solid
- PPR per game
- 3.0
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 107
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.303Solid
- PPR per game
- 17.5
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 633
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.301Solid
- PPR per game
- 17.0
- Target share
- 33%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 451
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.288Rotational
- PPR per game
- 9.3
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 354
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.287Rotational
- PPR per game
- 13.0
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 497
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.285Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.6
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 616
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.283Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 431
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.279Rotational
- PPR per game
- 13.3
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 286
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.277Rotational
- PPR per game
- 16.9
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 671
PPR per snap is our sanctioned proxy for FP per route run. tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate it — offensive snaps are the in-house denominator (per opportunity, independent of playing time). Because snaps include non-route plays, these values run lower than the per-route benchmarks @FantasyPtsData posts (Tyreek 0.85, Puka 0.75 FP/route) — different denominator, not comparable. Bands are our own 2023–25 WR distribution. Historical, descriptive — not a projection. How it works →