Loading…
WR Efficiency Leaderboard
The most efficient WRs by PPR per snap — points produced per opportunity.
ProxyPPR per snap, not FP per route run.tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate a route denominator — offensive snaps stand in (points produced per opportunity, independent of playing time). Values run lower than per-route benchmarks; the bands are our own field.
As-of weekAs of Week 9, 2025Point-in-time: aggregates Weeks 1–9 only.
Efficiency bandsElite≥ 0.40Strong≥ 0.35Solid≥ 0.30Rotational< 0.30PPR per snap · from our 2023–25 qualified-WR field
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
| # | Player | PPR/snap | PPR/g | Tgt% | Snaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Jaxon Smith-NjigbaWR SEA | 0.492Elite | 22.1 | 39% | 360 |
| 2 |  Puka NacuaWR LAR | 0.490Elite | 23.1 | 31% | 330 |
| 3 |  Rashee RiceWR KC | 0.477Elite | 22.4 | 27% | 141 |
| 4 |  Amon-Ra St. BrownWR DET | 0.371Strong | 20.7 | 33% | 446 |
| 5 |  Keenan AllenWR LAC | 0.367Strong | 14.0 | — | 343 |
| 6 |  DeMario DouglasWR NE | 0.359Strong | 7.0 | — | 175 |
| 7 |  Ja'Marr ChaseWR CIN | 0.356Strong | 20.9 | 33% | 527 |
| 8 |  Tyreek HillWR MIA | 0.345Solid | 13.4 | 25% | 155 |
| 9 |  Stefon DiggsWRNE | 0.337Solid | 12.0 | — | 320 |
| 10 |  Luther Burden IIIWR CHI | 0.331Solid | 5.2 | — | 111 |
| 11 |  Davante AdamsWRLAR | 0.324Solid | 16.6 | 27% | 411 |
| 12 |  Drake LondonWR ATL | 0.317Solid | 19.1 | 33% | 422 |
| 13 |  George PickensWR DAL | 0.306Solid | 17.9 | — | 527 |
| 14 |  Khalil ShakirWR BUF | 0.304Solid | 12.1 | — | 317 |
| 15 |  Michael Pittman Jr.WR IND | 0.299Rotational | 16.2 | 24% | 489 |
| 16 |  DeAndre HopkinsWR BAL | 0.299Rotational | 5.2 | — | 138 |
| 17 |  Deebo SamuelWR WSH | 0.295Rotational | 13.4 | 27% | 365 |
| 18 |  Luke McCaffreyWRWSH | 0.295Rotational | 5.7 | — | 174 |
| 19 |  Emeka EgbukaWR TB | 0.292Rotational | 15.4 | 24% | 421 |
| 20 |  CeeDee LambWRDAL | 0.292Rotational | 15.0 | 25% | 309 |
| 21 |  Hollywood BrownWRKC | 0.290Rotational | 10.8 | — | 334 |
| 22 |  Jaylen WaddleWRMIA | 0.289Rotational | 13.8 | — | 429 |
| 23 |  Josh DownsWRIND | 0.281Rotational | 10.3 | — | 293 |
| 24 |  Garrett WilsonWR NYJ | 0.273Rotational | 16.6 | 38% | 364 |
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.492Elite
- PPR per game
- 22.1
- Target share
- 39%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 360
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.490Elite
- PPR per game
- 23.1
- Target share
- 31%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 330
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.477Elite
- PPR per game
- 22.4
- Target share
- 27%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 141
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.371Strong
- PPR per game
- 20.7
- Target share
- 33%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 446
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.367Strong
- PPR per game
- 14.0
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 343
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.359Strong
- PPR per game
- 7.0
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 175
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.356Strong
- PPR per game
- 20.9
- Target share
- 33%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 527
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.345Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.4
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 155
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.337Solid
- PPR per game
- 12.0
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 320
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.331Solid
- PPR per game
- 5.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 111
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.324Solid
- PPR per game
- 16.6
- Target share
- 27%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 411
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.317Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.1
- Target share
- 33%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 422
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.306Solid
- PPR per game
- 17.9
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 527
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.304Solid
- PPR per game
- 12.1
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 317
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.299Rotational
- PPR per game
- 16.2
- Target share
- 24%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 489
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.299Rotational
- PPR per game
- 5.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 138
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.295Rotational
- PPR per game
- 13.4
- Target share
- 27%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 365
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.295Rotational
- PPR per game
- 5.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 174
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.292Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.4
- Target share
- 24%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 421
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.292Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.0
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 309
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.290Rotational
- PPR per game
- 10.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 334
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.289Rotational
- PPR per game
- 13.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 429
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.281Rotational
- PPR per game
- 10.3
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 293
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.273Rotational
- PPR per game
- 16.6
- Target share
- 38%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 364
PPR per snap is our sanctioned proxy for FP per route run. tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate it — offensive snaps are the in-house denominator (per opportunity, independent of playing time). Because snaps include non-route plays, these values run lower than the per-route benchmarks @FantasyPtsData posts (Tyreek 0.85, Puka 0.75 FP/route) — different denominator, not comparable. Bands are our own 2023–25 WR distribution. Historical, descriptive — not a projection. How it works →