Loading…
WR Efficiency Leaderboard
The most efficient WRs by PPR per snap — points produced per opportunity.
ProxyPPR per snap, not FP per route run.tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate a route denominator — offensive snaps stand in (points produced per opportunity, independent of playing time). Values run lower than per-route benchmarks; the bands are our own field.
As-of weekAs of Week 8, 2025Point-in-time: aggregates Weeks 1–8 only.
Efficiency bandsElite≥ 0.40Strong≥ 0.35Solid≥ 0.30Rotational< 0.30PPR per snap · from our 2023–25 qualified-WR field
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
| # | Player | PPR/snap | PPR/g | Tgt% | Snaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Puka NacuaWR LAR | 0.477Elite | 23.1 | 31% | 291 |
| 2 |  Jaxon Smith-NjigbaWR SEA | 0.475Elite | 22.1 | 39% | 326 |
| 3 |  Amon-Ra St. BrownWR DET | 0.381Strong | 21.0 | 32% | 385 |
| 4 |  Keenan AllenWR LAC | 0.376Strong | 15.0 | 24% | 319 |
| 5 |  Ja'Marr ChaseWR CIN | 0.371Strong | 21.3 | 35% | 460 |
| 6 |  Tyreek HillWR MIA | 0.345Solid | 13.4 | 25% | 155 |
| 7 |  DeAndre HopkinsWR BAL | 0.343Solid | 5.9 | — | 120 |
| 8 |  Stefon DiggsWR NE | 0.341Solid | 11.9 | 24% | 279 |
| 9 |  Luther Burden IIIWR CHI | 0.331Solid | 5.2 | — | 111 |
| 10 |  George PickensWR DAL | 0.317Solid | 18.4 | — | 466 |
| 11 |  Khalil ShakirWR BUF | 0.307Solid | 12.2 | — | 277 |
| 12 |  Deebo SamuelWR WSH | 0.306Solid | 14.0 | 26% | 321 |
| 13 |  Davante AdamsWRLAR | 0.303Solid | 15.7 | 27% | 363 |
| 14 |  Michael Pittman Jr.WR IND | 0.299Rotational | 15.7 | — | 420 |
| 15 |  CeeDee LambWRDAL | 0.299Rotational | 15.0 | — | 250 |
| 16 |  Luke McCaffreyWRWSH | 0.295Rotational | 6.4 | — | 174 |
| 17 |  Emeka EgbukaWR TB | 0.292Rotational | 15.4 | 24% | 421 |
| 18 |  Jaylen WaddleWRMIA | 0.290Rotational | 13.7 | — | 378 |
| 19 |  DK MetcalfWR PIT | 0.284Rotational | 14.7 | — | 363 |
| 20 |  Hollywood BrownWR KC | 0.284Rotational | 10.9 | — | 308 |
| 21 |  Jordan AddisonWR MIN | 0.280Rotational | 16.0 | — | 228 |
| 22 |  Josh DownsWRIND | 0.276Rotational | 9.5 | — | 241 |
| 23 |  Troy FranklinWR DEN | 0.275Rotational | 12.0 | — | 350 |
| 24 |  Garrett WilsonWR NYJ | 0.273Rotational | 16.6 | 38% | 364 |
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.477Elite
- PPR per game
- 23.1
- Target share
- 31%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 291
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.475Elite
- PPR per game
- 22.1
- Target share
- 39%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 326
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.381Strong
- PPR per game
- 21.0
- Target share
- 32%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 385
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.376Strong
- PPR per game
- 15.0
- Target share
- 24%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 319
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.371Strong
- PPR per game
- 21.3
- Target share
- 35%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 460
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.345Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.4
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 155
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.343Solid
- PPR per game
- 5.9
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 120
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.341Solid
- PPR per game
- 11.9
- Target share
- 24%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 279
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.331Solid
- PPR per game
- 5.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 111
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.317Solid
- PPR per game
- 18.4
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 466
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.307Solid
- PPR per game
- 12.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 277
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.306Solid
- PPR per game
- 14.0
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 321
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.303Solid
- PPR per game
- 15.7
- Target share
- 27%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 363
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.299Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 420
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.299Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.0
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 250
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.295Rotational
- PPR per game
- 6.4
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 174
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.292Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.4
- Target share
- 24%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 421
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.290Rotational
- PPR per game
- 13.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 378
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.284Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 363
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.284Rotational
- PPR per game
- 10.9
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 308
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.280Rotational
- PPR per game
- 16.0
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 228
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.276Rotational
- PPR per game
- 9.5
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 241
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.275Rotational
- PPR per game
- 12.0
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 350
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.273Rotational
- PPR per game
- 16.6
- Target share
- 38%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 364
PPR per snap is our sanctioned proxy for FP per route run. tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate it — offensive snaps are the in-house denominator (per opportunity, independent of playing time). Because snaps include non-route plays, these values run lower than the per-route benchmarks @FantasyPtsData posts (Tyreek 0.85, Puka 0.75 FP/route) — different denominator, not comparable. Bands are our own 2023–25 WR distribution. Historical, descriptive — not a projection. How it works →