Loading…
WR Efficiency Leaderboard
The most efficient WRs by PPR per snap — points produced per opportunity.
ProxyPPR per snap, not FP per route run.tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate a route denominator — offensive snaps stand in (points produced per opportunity, independent of playing time). Values run lower than per-route benchmarks; the bands are our own field.
As-of weekAs of Week 11, 2025Point-in-time: aggregates Weeks 1–11 only.
Efficiency bandsElite≥ 0.40Strong≥ 0.35Solid≥ 0.30Rotational< 0.30PPR per snap · from our 2023–25 qualified-WR field
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
| # | Player | PPR/snap | PPR/g | Tgt% | Snaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Puka NacuaWR LAR | 0.483Elite | 21.5 | 29% | 400 |
| 2 |  Jaxon Smith-NjigbaWR SEA | 0.478Elite | 21.8 | 39% | 456 |
| 3 |  Rashee RiceWR KC | 0.397Strong | 19.3 | 26% | 194 |
| 4 |  DeMario DouglasWR NE | 0.359Strong | 6.8 | — | 207 |
| 5 |  Stefon DiggsWRNE | 0.355Strong | 13.0 | 24% | 402 |
| 6 |  Tyreek HillWR MIA | 0.345Solid | 13.4 | 25% | 155 |
| 7 |  Amon-Ra St. BrownWR DET | 0.338Solid | 18.8 | 32% | 557 |
| 8 |  Keenan AllenWR LAC | 0.335Solid | 12.7 | — | 416 |
| 9 |  George PickensWR DAL | 0.334Solid | 19.1 | 24% | 572 |
| 10 |  Ja'Marr ChaseWR CIN | 0.328Solid | 19.4 | 33% | 591 |
| 11 |  Davante AdamsWRLAR | 0.326Solid | 16.0 | 27% | 490 |
| 12 |  Drake LondonWR ATL | 0.325Solid | 19.7 | 33% | 545 |
| 13 |  Deebo SamuelWR WSH | 0.309Solid | 14.1 | 26% | 457 |
| 14 |  CeeDee LambWRDAL | 0.301Solid | 15.4 | 25% | 358 |
| 15 |  Luke McCaffreyWRWSH | 0.295Rotational | 5.7 | — | 174 |
| 16 |  Jaylen WaddleWRMIA | 0.291Rotational | 13.8 | 24% | 520 |
| 17 |  Nico CollinsWR HOU | 0.291Rotational | 15.3 | 26% | 475 |
| 18 |  Hollywood BrownWRKC | 0.288Rotational | 10.5 | — | 364 |
| 19 |  Luther Burden IIIWR CHI | 0.285Rotational | 5.6 | — | 177 |
| 20 |  Emeka EgbukaWR TB | 0.284Rotational | 15.6 | 26% | 548 |
| 21 |  Khalil ShakirWR BUF | 0.280Rotational | 11.0 | — | 392 |
| 22 |  Chris OlaveWR NO | 0.275Rotational | 14.8 | 29% | 538 |
| 23 |  Michael Pittman Jr.WR IND | 0.272Rotational | 15.0 | — | 551 |
| 24 |  Troy FranklinWR DEN | 0.271Rotational | 12.0 | — | 486 |
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.483Elite
- PPR per game
- 21.5
- Target share
- 29%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 400
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.478Elite
- PPR per game
- 21.8
- Target share
- 39%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 456
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.397Strong
- PPR per game
- 19.3
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 194
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.359Strong
- PPR per game
- 6.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 207
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.355Strong
- PPR per game
- 13.0
- Target share
- 24%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 402
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.345Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.4
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 155
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.338Solid
- PPR per game
- 18.8
- Target share
- 32%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 557
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.335Solid
- PPR per game
- 12.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 416
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.334Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.1
- Target share
- 24%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 572
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.328Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.4
- Target share
- 33%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 591
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.326Solid
- PPR per game
- 16.0
- Target share
- 27%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 490
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.325Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.7
- Target share
- 33%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 545
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.309Solid
- PPR per game
- 14.1
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 457
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.301Solid
- PPR per game
- 15.4
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 358
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.295Rotational
- PPR per game
- 5.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 174
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.291Rotational
- PPR per game
- 13.8
- Target share
- 24%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 520
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.291Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.3
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 475
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.288Rotational
- PPR per game
- 10.5
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 364
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.285Rotational
- PPR per game
- 5.6
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 177
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.284Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.6
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 548
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.280Rotational
- PPR per game
- 11.0
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 392
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.275Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.8
- Target share
- 29%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 538
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.272Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.0
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 551
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.271Rotational
- PPR per game
- 12.0
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 486
PPR per snap is our sanctioned proxy for FP per route run. tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate it — offensive snaps are the in-house denominator (per opportunity, independent of playing time). Because snaps include non-route plays, these values run lower than the per-route benchmarks @FantasyPtsData posts (Tyreek 0.85, Puka 0.75 FP/route) — different denominator, not comparable. Bands are our own 2023–25 WR distribution. Historical, descriptive — not a projection. How it works →