Loading…
WR Efficiency Leaderboard
The most efficient WRs by PPR per snap — points produced per opportunity.
ProxyPPR per snap, not FP per route run.tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate a route denominator — offensive snaps stand in (points produced per opportunity, independent of playing time). Values run lower than per-route benchmarks; the bands are our own field.
As-of weekAs of Week 14, 2024Point-in-time: aggregates Weeks 1–14 only.
Efficiency bandsElite≥ 0.40Strong≥ 0.35Solid≥ 0.30Rotational< 0.30PPR per snap · from our 2023–25 qualified-WR field
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
| # | Player | PPR/snap | PPR/g | Tgt% | Snaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Puka NacuaWR LAR | 0.447Elite | 19.0 | 29% | 341 |
| 2 |  Nico CollinsWR HOU | 0.434Elite | 19.5 | 26% | 360 |
| 3 |  Rashee RiceWR KC | 0.419Elite | 16.2 | — | 155 |
| 4 |  Ja'Marr ChaseWR CIN | 0.409Elite | 24.4 | 26% | 776 |
| 5 |  KaVontae TurpinWR DAL | 0.390Strong | 6.1 | — | 204 |
| 6 |  Jauan JenningsWR SF | 0.346Solid | 15.5 | 27% | 493 |
| 7 |  Chris GodwinWR TB | 0.345Solid | 19.7 | 28% | 399 |
| 8 |  Khalil ShakirWR BUF | 0.343Solid | 13.1 | — | 458 |
| 9 |  Josh DownsWR IND | 0.342Solid | 13.8 | 26% | 402 |
| 10 |  Cooper KuppWRLAR | 0.335Solid | 18.4 | 29% | 494 |
| 11 |  Jayden ReedWR GB | 0.325Solid | 12.9 | — | 517 |
| 12 |  Brian Thomas Jr.WR JAX | 0.316Solid | 14.0 | — | 576 |
| 13 |  Mike EvansWRTB | 0.314Solid | 14.4 | — | 459 |
| 14 |  Tee HigginsWRCIN | 0.314Solid | 16.6 | 27% | 424 |
| 15 |  Ladd McConkeyWR LAC | 0.311Solid | 13.6 | 26% | 526 |
| 16 |  Marvin Mims Jr.WR DEN | 0.308Solid | 4.7 | — | 200 |
| 17 |  Adam ThielenWR CAR | 0.306Solid | 12.8 | — | 251 |
| 18 |  Justin JeffersonWR MIN | 0.302Solid | 18.1 | 30% | 779 |
| 19 |  Terry McLaurinWR WSH | 0.297Rotational | 15.6 | — | 682 |
| 20 |  CeeDee LambWRDAL | 0.296Rotational | 16.9 | 28% | 742 |
| 21 |  DeAndre HopkinsWRKC | 0.295Rotational | 9.8 | — | 434 |
| 22 |  Amon-Ra St. BrownWR DET | 0.293Rotational | 17.4 | 27% | 772 |
| 23 |  Jordan AddisonWRMIN | 0.289Rotational | 15.0 | — | 570 |
| 24 |  Mecole HardmanWRKC | 0.289Rotational | 2.8 | — | 115 |
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.447Elite
- PPR per game
- 19.0
- Target share
- 29%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 341
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.434Elite
- PPR per game
- 19.5
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 360
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.419Elite
- PPR per game
- 16.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 155
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.409Elite
- PPR per game
- 24.4
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 776
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.390Strong
- PPR per game
- 6.1
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 204
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.346Solid
- PPR per game
- 15.5
- Target share
- 27%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 493
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.345Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.7
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 399
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.343Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.1
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 458
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.342Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.8
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 402
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.335Solid
- PPR per game
- 18.4
- Target share
- 29%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 494
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.325Solid
- PPR per game
- 12.9
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 517
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.316Solid
- PPR per game
- 14.0
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 576
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.314Solid
- PPR per game
- 14.4
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 459
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.314Solid
- PPR per game
- 16.6
- Target share
- 27%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 424
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.311Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.6
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 526
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.308Solid
- PPR per game
- 4.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 200
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.306Solid
- PPR per game
- 12.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 251
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.302Solid
- PPR per game
- 18.1
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 779
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.297Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.6
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 682
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.296Rotational
- PPR per game
- 16.9
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 742
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.295Rotational
- PPR per game
- 9.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 434
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.293Rotational
- PPR per game
- 17.4
- Target share
- 27%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 772
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.289Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.0
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 570
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.289Rotational
- PPR per game
- 2.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 115
PPR per snap is our sanctioned proxy for FP per route run. tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate it — offensive snaps are the in-house denominator (per opportunity, independent of playing time). Because snaps include non-route plays, these values run lower than the per-route benchmarks @FantasyPtsData posts (Tyreek 0.85, Puka 0.75 FP/route) — different denominator, not comparable. Bands are our own 2023–25 WR distribution. Historical, descriptive — not a projection. How it works →