Loading…
WR Efficiency Leaderboard
The most efficient WRs by PPR per snap — points produced per opportunity.
ProxyPPR per snap, not FP per route run.tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate a route denominator — offensive snaps stand in (points produced per opportunity, independent of playing time). Values run lower than per-route benchmarks; the bands are our own field.
As-of weekAs of Week 13, 2024Point-in-time: aggregates Weeks 1–13 only.
Efficiency bandsElite≥ 0.40Strong≥ 0.35Solid≥ 0.30Rotational< 0.30PPR per snap · from our 2023–25 qualified-WR field
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
| # | Player | PPR/snap | PPR/g | Tgt% | Snaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Nico CollinsWR HOU | 0.434Elite | 19.5 | 26% | 360 |
| 2 |  Rashee RiceWR KC | 0.419Elite | 16.2 | — | 155 |
| 3 |  Puka NacuaWR LAR | 0.392Strong | 15.8 | 26% | 282 |
| 4 |  KaVontae TurpinWR DAL | 0.389Strong | 6.3 | — | 194 |
| 5 |  Ja'Marr ChaseWR CIN | 0.384Strong | 22.7 | 25% | 710 |
| 6 |  Tee HigginsWRCIN | 0.356Strong | 18.4 | 29% | 362 |
| 7 |  Chris GodwinWR TB | 0.345Solid | 19.7 | 28% | 399 |
| 8 |  Jayden ReedWR GB | 0.342Solid | 14.0 | — | 492 |
| 9 |  Josh DownsWR IND | 0.342Solid | 13.8 | 26% | 402 |
| 10 |  Cooper KuppWRLAR | 0.338Solid | 18.2 | 29% | 430 |
| 11 |  Khalil ShakirWR BUF | 0.329Solid | 12.3 | — | 411 |
| 12 |  Mike EvansWRTB | 0.326Solid | 14.8 | — | 408 |
| 13 |  Jauan JenningsWR SF | 0.318Solid | 14.2 | 26% | 448 |
| 14 |  Brian Thomas Jr.WR JAX | 0.313Solid | 13.8 | — | 529 |
| 15 |  Ladd McConkeyWR LAC | 0.311Solid | 13.6 | 26% | 526 |
| 16 |  Marvin Mims Jr.WR DEN | 0.308Solid | 4.7 | — | 200 |
| 17 |  Amon-Ra St. BrownWR DET | 0.307Solid | 18.0 | 28% | 704 |
| 18 |  Terry McLaurinWR WSH | 0.297Rotational | 15.6 | — | 682 |
| 19 |  A.J. BrownWR PHI | 0.292Rotational | 16.4 | 33% | 505 |
| 20 |  DeAndre HopkinsWRKC | 0.290Rotational | 9.6 | — | 396 |
| 21 |  Adam ThielenWR CAR | 0.290Rotational | 11.5 | — | 198 |
| 22 |  CeeDee LambWRDAL | 0.289Rotational | 16.5 | 28% | 684 |
| 23 |  Mecole HardmanWRKC | 0.289Rotational | 2.8 | — | 115 |
| 24 |  Stefon DiggsWRHOU | 0.283Rotational | 15.2 | — | 431 |
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.434Elite
- PPR per game
- 19.5
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 360
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.419Elite
- PPR per game
- 16.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 155
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.392Strong
- PPR per game
- 15.8
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 282
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.389Strong
- PPR per game
- 6.3
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 194
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.384Strong
- PPR per game
- 22.7
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 710
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.356Strong
- PPR per game
- 18.4
- Target share
- 29%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 362
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.345Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.7
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 399
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.342Solid
- PPR per game
- 14.0
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 492
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.342Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.8
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 402
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.338Solid
- PPR per game
- 18.2
- Target share
- 29%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 430
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.329Solid
- PPR per game
- 12.3
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 411
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.326Solid
- PPR per game
- 14.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 408
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.318Solid
- PPR per game
- 14.2
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 448
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.313Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 529
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.311Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.6
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 526
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.308Solid
- PPR per game
- 4.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 200
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.307Solid
- PPR per game
- 18.0
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 704
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.297Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.6
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 682
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.292Rotational
- PPR per game
- 16.4
- Target share
- 33%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 505
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.290Rotational
- PPR per game
- 9.6
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 396
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.290Rotational
- PPR per game
- 11.5
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 198
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.289Rotational
- PPR per game
- 16.5
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 684
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.289Rotational
- PPR per game
- 2.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 115
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.283Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 431
PPR per snap is our sanctioned proxy for FP per route run. tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate it — offensive snaps are the in-house denominator (per opportunity, independent of playing time). Because snaps include non-route plays, these values run lower than the per-route benchmarks @FantasyPtsData posts (Tyreek 0.85, Puka 0.75 FP/route) — different denominator, not comparable. Bands are our own 2023–25 WR distribution. Historical, descriptive — not a projection. How it works →