Loading…
WR Efficiency Leaderboard
The most efficient WRs by PPR per snap — points produced per opportunity.
ProxyPPR per snap, not FP per route run.tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate a route denominator — offensive snaps stand in (points produced per opportunity, independent of playing time). Values run lower than per-route benchmarks; the bands are our own field.
As-of weekAs of Week 10, 2025Point-in-time: aggregates Weeks 1–10 only.
Efficiency bandsElite≥ 0.40Strong≥ 0.35Solid≥ 0.30Rotational< 0.30PPR per snap · from our 2023–25 qualified-WR field
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
| # | Player | PPR/snap | PPR/g | Tgt% | Snaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Jaxon Smith-NjigbaWR SEA | 0.511Elite | 21.9 | 40% | 386 |
| 2 |  Puka NacuaWR LAR | 0.489Elite | 22.4 | 29% | 366 |
| 3 |  Rashee RiceWR KC | 0.477Elite | 22.4 | 27% | 141 |
| 4 |  Amon-Ra St. BrownWR DET | 0.364Strong | 20.2 | 32% | 500 |
| 5 |  DeMario DouglasWR NE | 0.363Strong | 6.8 | — | 188 |
| 6 |  Ja'Marr ChaseWR CIN | 0.356Strong | 20.9 | 33% | 527 |
| 7 |  Stefon DiggsWRNE | 0.347Solid | 12.3 | 24% | 356 |
| 8 |  Tyreek HillWR MIA | 0.345Solid | 13.4 | 25% | 155 |
| 9 |  Davante AdamsWRLAR | 0.343Solid | 17.0 | 26% | 446 |
| 10 |  Keenan AllenWR LAC | 0.342Solid | 13.0 | — | 380 |
| 11 |  Drake LondonWR ATL | 0.327Solid | 19.8 | 33% | 484 |
| 12 |  Luther Burden IIIWR CHI | 0.311Solid | 5.6 | — | 144 |
| 13 |  George PickensWR DAL | 0.306Solid | 17.9 | — | 527 |
| 14 |  Emeka EgbukaWR TB | 0.304Solid | 16.3 | 25% | 482 |
| 15 |  Jaylen WaddleWRMIA | 0.303Solid | 14.3 | — | 473 |
| 16 |  Khalil ShakirWR BUF | 0.302Solid | 12.1 | — | 362 |
| 17 |  Deebo SamuelWR WSH | 0.296Rotational | 13.4 | 26% | 407 |
| 18 |  Luke McCaffreyWRWSH | 0.295Rotational | 5.7 | — | 174 |
| 19 |  CeeDee LambWRDAL | 0.292Rotational | 15.0 | 25% | 309 |
| 20 |  Hollywood BrownWRKC | 0.290Rotational | 10.8 | — | 334 |
| 21 |  DeAndre HopkinsWR BAL | 0.285Rotational | 5.0 | — | 157 |
| 22 |  Chris OlaveWR NO | 0.275Rotational | 14.8 | 29% | 538 |
| 23 |  Nico CollinsWR HOU | 0.274Rotational | 14.2 | 26% | 416 |
| 24 |  Michael Pittman Jr.WR IND | 0.272Rotational | 15.0 | — | 551 |
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.511Elite
- PPR per game
- 21.9
- Target share
- 40%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 386
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.489Elite
- PPR per game
- 22.4
- Target share
- 29%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 366
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.477Elite
- PPR per game
- 22.4
- Target share
- 27%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 141
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.364Strong
- PPR per game
- 20.2
- Target share
- 32%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 500
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.363Strong
- PPR per game
- 6.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 188
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.356Strong
- PPR per game
- 20.9
- Target share
- 33%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 527
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.347Solid
- PPR per game
- 12.3
- Target share
- 24%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 356
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.345Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.4
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 155
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.343Solid
- PPR per game
- 17.0
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 446
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.342Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.0
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 380
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.327Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.8
- Target share
- 33%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 484
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.311Solid
- PPR per game
- 5.6
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 144
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.306Solid
- PPR per game
- 17.9
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 527
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.304Solid
- PPR per game
- 16.3
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 482
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.303Solid
- PPR per game
- 14.3
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 473
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.302Solid
- PPR per game
- 12.1
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 362
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.296Rotational
- PPR per game
- 13.4
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 407
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.295Rotational
- PPR per game
- 5.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 174
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.292Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.0
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 309
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.290Rotational
- PPR per game
- 10.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 334
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.285Rotational
- PPR per game
- 5.0
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 157
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.275Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.8
- Target share
- 29%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 538
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.274Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.2
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 416
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.272Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.0
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 551
PPR per snap is our sanctioned proxy for FP per route run. tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate it — offensive snaps are the in-house denominator (per opportunity, independent of playing time). Because snaps include non-route plays, these values run lower than the per-route benchmarks @FantasyPtsData posts (Tyreek 0.85, Puka 0.75 FP/route) — different denominator, not comparable. Bands are our own 2023–25 WR distribution. Historical, descriptive — not a projection. How it works →