Loading…
WR Efficiency Leaderboard
The most efficient WRs by PPR per snap — points produced per opportunity.
ProxyPPR per snap, not FP per route run.tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate a route denominator — offensive snaps stand in (points produced per opportunity, independent of playing time). Values run lower than per-route benchmarks; the bands are our own field.
As-of weekAs of Week 3, 2023Point-in-time: aggregates Weeks 1–3 only.
Efficiency bandsElite≥ 0.40Strong≥ 0.35Solid≥ 0.30Rotational< 0.30PPR per snap · from our 2023–25 qualified-WR field
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
| # | Player | PPR/snap | PPR/g | Tgt% | Snaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Tyreek HillWR MIA | 0.658Elite | 30.1 | 38% | 137 |
| 2 |  Davante AdamsWR LV | 0.470Elite | 25.1 | 38% | 160 |
| 3 |  Mike EvansWR TB | 0.469Elite | 21.6 | 32% | 138 |
| 4 |  Keenan AllenWR LAC | 0.461Elite | 30.3 | 32% | 197 |
| 5 |  Jakobi MeyersWRLV | 0.409Elite | 22.3 | 33% | 109 |
| 6 |  Justin JeffersonWR MIN | 0.386Strong | 25.6 | 29% | 199 |
| 7 |  Tank DellWR HOU | 0.380Strong | 17.4 | — | 137 |
| 8 |  Puka NacuaWR LAR | 0.347Solid | 21.4 | 34% | 185 |
| 9 |  Stefon DiggsWR BUF | 0.344Solid | 19.6 | 32% | 171 |
| 10 |  Deebo Samuel Sr.WR SF | 0.329Solid | 19.5 | 33% | 178 |
| 11 |  Nico CollinsWRHOU | 0.326Solid | 15.7 | — | 144 |
| 12 |  Jordan AddisonWRMIN | 0.325Solid | 14.5 | — | 134 |
| 13 |  Chris OlaveWR NO | 0.324Solid | 17.4 | 43% | 161 |
| 14 |  Jayden ReedWR GB | 0.318Solid | 11.9 | — | 112 |
| 15 |  Romeo DoubsWRGB | 0.310Solid | 14.0 | — | 135 |
| 16 |  Rashid ShaheedWRNO | 0.302Solid | 11.8 | — | 117 |
| 17 |  Mike WilliamsWRLAC | 0.301Solid | 16.7 | — | 167 |
| 18 |  Amon-Ra St. BrownWR DET | 0.292Rotational | 17.6 | 31% | 181 |
| 19 |  Adam ThielenWR CAR | 0.285Rotational | 18.4 | — | 193 |
| 20 |  Amari CooperWR CLE | 0.285Rotational | 15.8 | 26% | 166 |
| 21 |  DK MetcalfWR SEA | 0.274Rotational | 14.8 | — | 162 |
| 22 |  George PickensWR PIT | 0.273Rotational | 14.3 | 25% | 157 |
| 23 |  Tutu AtwellWRLAR | 0.269Rotational | 16.8 | — | 187 |
| 24 |  CeeDee LambWR DAL | 0.268Rotational | 15.7 | — | 176 |
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.658Elite
- PPR per game
- 30.1
- Target share
- 38%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 137
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.470Elite
- PPR per game
- 25.1
- Target share
- 38%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 160
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.469Elite
- PPR per game
- 21.6
- Target share
- 32%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 138
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.461Elite
- PPR per game
- 30.3
- Target share
- 32%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 197
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.409Elite
- PPR per game
- 22.3
- Target share
- 33%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 109
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.386Strong
- PPR per game
- 25.6
- Target share
- 29%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 199
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.380Strong
- PPR per game
- 17.4
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 137
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.347Solid
- PPR per game
- 21.4
- Target share
- 34%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 185
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.344Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.6
- Target share
- 32%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 171
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.329Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.5
- Target share
- 33%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 178
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.326Solid
- PPR per game
- 15.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 144
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.325Solid
- PPR per game
- 14.5
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 134
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.324Solid
- PPR per game
- 17.4
- Target share
- 43%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 161
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.318Solid
- PPR per game
- 11.9
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 112
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.310Solid
- PPR per game
- 14.0
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 135
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.302Solid
- PPR per game
- 11.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 117
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.301Solid
- PPR per game
- 16.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 167
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.292Rotational
- PPR per game
- 17.6
- Target share
- 31%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 181
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.285Rotational
- PPR per game
- 18.4
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 193
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.285Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.8
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 166
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.274Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 162
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.273Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.3
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 157
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.269Rotational
- PPR per game
- 16.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 187
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.268Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 176
PPR per snap is our sanctioned proxy for FP per route run. tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate it — offensive snaps are the in-house denominator (per opportunity, independent of playing time). Because snaps include non-route plays, these values run lower than the per-route benchmarks @FantasyPtsData posts (Tyreek 0.85, Puka 0.75 FP/route) — different denominator, not comparable. Bands are our own 2023–25 WR distribution. Historical, descriptive — not a projection. How it works →