Loading…
WR Efficiency Leaderboard
The most efficient WRs by PPR per snap — points produced per opportunity.
ProxyPPR per snap, not FP per route run.tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate a route denominator — offensive snaps stand in (points produced per opportunity, independent of playing time). Values run lower than per-route benchmarks; the bands are our own field.
As-of weekAs of Week 16, 2023Point-in-time: aggregates Weeks 1–16 only.
Efficiency bandsElite≥ 0.40Strong≥ 0.35Solid≥ 0.30Rotational< 0.30PPR per snap · from our 2023–25 qualified-WR field
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
| # | Player | PPR/snap | PPR/g | Tgt% | Snaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Tyreek HillWR MIA | 0.565Elite | 24.4 | 35% | 605 |
| 2 |  KaVontae TurpinWR DAL | 0.459Elite | 4.2 | — | 129 |
| 3 |  CeeDee LambWRDAL | 0.377Strong | 21.8 | 28% | 868 |
| 4 |  Justin JeffersonWR MIN | 0.362Strong | 19.4 | 28% | 429 |
| 5 |  Nico CollinsWR HOU | 0.360Strong | 16.2 | — | 584 |
| 6 |  Keenan AllenWR LAC | 0.358Strong | 21.5 | 31% | 779 |
| 7 |  Mike EvansWR TB | 0.351Strong | 17.8 | 26% | 761 |
| 8 |  Deebo Samuel Sr.WR SF | 0.350Strong | 16.9 | — | 629 |
| 9 |  Jayden ReedWR GB | 0.337Solid | 12.5 | — | 519 |
| 10 |  Rashee RiceWR KC | 0.336Solid | 13.0 | — | 580 |
| 11 |  Tank DellWRHOU | 0.334Solid | 15.0 | — | 494 |
| 12 |  Jaylen WaddleWRMIA | 0.325Solid | 14.2 | 26% | 611 |
| 13 |  Amon-Ra St. BrownWR DET | 0.313Solid | 20.1 | 30% | 900 |
| 14 |  Ja'Marr ChaseWR CIN | 0.310Solid | 17.8 | 27% | 805 |
| 15 |  Brandon AiyukWRSF | 0.305Solid | 15.7 | 26% | 719 |
| 16 |  Stefon DiggsWR BUF | 0.301Solid | 16.7 | 32% | 835 |
| 17 |  Mike WilliamsWRLAC | 0.301Solid | 16.7 | — | 167 |
| 18 |  Chris OlaveWR NO | 0.294Rotational | 15.1 | 32% | 718 |
| 19 |  A.J. BrownWR PHI | 0.292Rotational | 18.7 | 34% | 961 |
| 20 |  Puka NacuaWR LAR | 0.292Rotational | 17.7 | 31% | 910 |
| 21 |  DeAndre HopkinsWR TEN | 0.287Rotational | 12.8 | 28% | 668 |
| 22 |  DK MetcalfWR SEA | 0.282Rotational | 14.8 | — | 738 |
| 23 |  Curtis SamuelWR WSH | 0.281Rotational | 10.4 | — | 520 |
| 24 |  Kalif RaymondWRDET | 0.279Rotational | 5.9 | — | 317 |
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.565Elite
- PPR per game
- 24.4
- Target share
- 35%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 605
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.459Elite
- PPR per game
- 4.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 129
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.377Strong
- PPR per game
- 21.8
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 868
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.362Strong
- PPR per game
- 19.4
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 429
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.360Strong
- PPR per game
- 16.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 584
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.358Strong
- PPR per game
- 21.5
- Target share
- 31%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 779
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.351Strong
- PPR per game
- 17.8
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 761
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.350Strong
- PPR per game
- 16.9
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 629
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.337Solid
- PPR per game
- 12.5
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 519
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.336Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.0
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 580
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.334Solid
- PPR per game
- 15.0
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 494
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.325Solid
- PPR per game
- 14.2
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 611
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.313Solid
- PPR per game
- 20.1
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 900
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.310Solid
- PPR per game
- 17.8
- Target share
- 27%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 805
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.305Solid
- PPR per game
- 15.7
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 719
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.301Solid
- PPR per game
- 16.7
- Target share
- 32%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 835
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.301Solid
- PPR per game
- 16.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 167
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.294Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.1
- Target share
- 32%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 718
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.292Rotational
- PPR per game
- 18.7
- Target share
- 34%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 961
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.292Rotational
- PPR per game
- 17.7
- Target share
- 31%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 910
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.287Rotational
- PPR per game
- 12.8
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 668
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.282Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 738
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.281Rotational
- PPR per game
- 10.4
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 520
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.279Rotational
- PPR per game
- 5.9
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 317
PPR per snap is our sanctioned proxy for FP per route run. tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate it — offensive snaps are the in-house denominator (per opportunity, independent of playing time). Because snaps include non-route plays, these values run lower than the per-route benchmarks @FantasyPtsData posts (Tyreek 0.85, Puka 0.75 FP/route) — different denominator, not comparable. Bands are our own 2023–25 WR distribution. Historical, descriptive — not a projection. How it works →