Loading…
WR Efficiency Leaderboard
The most efficient WRs by PPR per snap — points produced per opportunity.
ProxyPPR per snap, not FP per route run.tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate a route denominator — offensive snaps stand in (points produced per opportunity, independent of playing time). Values run lower than per-route benchmarks; the bands are our own field.
As-of weekAs of Week 15, 2023Point-in-time: aggregates Weeks 1–15 only.
Efficiency bandsElite≥ 0.40Strong≥ 0.35Solid≥ 0.30Rotational< 0.30PPR per snap · from our 2023–25 qualified-WR field
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
| # | Player | PPR/snap | PPR/g | Tgt% | Snaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Tyreek HillWR MIA | 0.587Elite | 24.8 | 34% | 550 |
| 2 |  KaVontae TurpinWR DAL | 0.478Elite | 4.4 | — | 120 |
| 3 |  Deebo Samuel Sr.WR SF | 0.375Strong | 17.6 | — | 562 |
| 4 |  CeeDee LambWRDAL | 0.373Strong | 21.6 | 28% | 810 |
| 5 |  Keenan AllenWR LAC | 0.358Strong | 21.5 | 31% | 779 |
| 6 |  Nico CollinsWR HOU | 0.358Strong | 16.4 | — | 549 |
| 7 |  Rashee RiceWR KC | 0.350Strong | 13.1 | — | 523 |
| 8 |  Justin JeffersonWR MIN | 0.345Solid | 18.5 | 27% | 375 |
| 9 |  Mike EvansWR TB | 0.340Solid | 17.1 | 26% | 704 |
| 10 |  Jayden ReedWR GB | 0.337Solid | 12.5 | — | 519 |
| 11 |  Tank DellWRHOU | 0.334Solid | 15.0 | — | 494 |
| 12 |  Jaylen WaddleWRMIA | 0.330Solid | 14.8 | 27% | 583 |
| 13 |  Ja'Marr ChaseWR CIN | 0.310Solid | 17.8 | 27% | 805 |
| 14 |  Brandon AiyukWRSF | 0.309Solid | 15.5 | 26% | 653 |
| 15 |  Amon-Ra St. BrownWR DET | 0.308Solid | 19.4 | 30% | 822 |
| 16 |  DeAndre HopkinsWR TEN | 0.306Solid | 13.4 | 29% | 614 |
| 17 |  Jamison CrowderWR WSH | 0.306Solid | 2.6 | — | 118 |
| 18 |  Stefon DiggsWR BUF | 0.303Solid | 17.4 | 32% | 802 |
| 19 |  Mike WilliamsWRLAC | 0.301Solid | 16.7 | — | 167 |
| 20 |  A.J. BrownWR PHI | 0.300Solid | 19.0 | 34% | 888 |
| 21 |  Curtis SamuelWRWSH | 0.298Rotational | 11.0 | — | 480 |
| 22 |  Kalif RaymondWRDET | 0.284Rotational | 5.9 | — | 291 |
| 23 |  DK MetcalfWR SEA | 0.281Rotational | 14.8 | — | 683 |
| 24 |  Derius DavisWRLAC | 0.280Rotational | 2.0 | — | 102 |
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.587Elite
- PPR per game
- 24.8
- Target share
- 34%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 550
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.478Elite
- PPR per game
- 4.4
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 120
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.375Strong
- PPR per game
- 17.6
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 562
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.373Strong
- PPR per game
- 21.6
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 810
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.358Strong
- PPR per game
- 21.5
- Target share
- 31%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 779
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.358Strong
- PPR per game
- 16.4
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 549
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.350Strong
- PPR per game
- 13.1
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 523
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.345Solid
- PPR per game
- 18.5
- Target share
- 27%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 375
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.340Solid
- PPR per game
- 17.1
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 704
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.337Solid
- PPR per game
- 12.5
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 519
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.334Solid
- PPR per game
- 15.0
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 494
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.330Solid
- PPR per game
- 14.8
- Target share
- 27%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 583
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.310Solid
- PPR per game
- 17.8
- Target share
- 27%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 805
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.309Solid
- PPR per game
- 15.5
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 653
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.308Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.4
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 822
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.306Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.4
- Target share
- 29%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 614
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.306Solid
- PPR per game
- 2.6
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 118
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.303Solid
- PPR per game
- 17.4
- Target share
- 32%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 802
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.301Solid
- PPR per game
- 16.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 167
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.300Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.0
- Target share
- 34%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 888
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.298Rotational
- PPR per game
- 11.0
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 480
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.284Rotational
- PPR per game
- 5.9
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 291
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.281Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 683
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.280Rotational
- PPR per game
- 2.0
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 102
PPR per snap is our sanctioned proxy for FP per route run. tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate it — offensive snaps are the in-house denominator (per opportunity, independent of playing time). Because snaps include non-route plays, these values run lower than the per-route benchmarks @FantasyPtsData posts (Tyreek 0.85, Puka 0.75 FP/route) — different denominator, not comparable. Bands are our own 2023–25 WR distribution. Historical, descriptive — not a projection. How it works →