Loading…
WR Efficiency Leaderboard
The most efficient WRs by PPR per snap — points produced per opportunity.
ProxyPPR per snap, not FP per route run.tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate a route denominator — offensive snaps stand in (points produced per opportunity, independent of playing time). Values run lower than per-route benchmarks; the bands are our own field.
As-of weekAs of Week 13, 2023Point-in-time: aggregates Weeks 1–13 only.
Efficiency bandsElite≥ 0.40Strong≥ 0.35Solid≥ 0.30Rotational< 0.30PPR per snap · from our 2023–25 qualified-WR field
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
| # | Player | PPR/snap | PPR/g | Tgt% | Snaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Tyreek HillWR MIA | 0.606Elite | 26.1 | 36% | 516 |
| 2 |  KaVontae TurpinWR DAL | 0.511Elite | 5.0 | — | 108 |
| 3 |  CeeDee LambWRDAL | 0.389Strong | 22.1 | 28% | 680 |
| 4 |  Mike EvansWR TB | 0.378Strong | 18.5 | 27% | 588 |
| 5 |  Keenan AllenWR LAC | 0.373Strong | 22.2 | 32% | 714 |
| 6 |  Justin JeffersonWR MIN | 0.367Strong | 21.8 | 30% | 297 |
| 7 |  Nico CollinsWR HOU | 0.355Strong | 17.6 | 25% | 546 |
| 8 |  Rashee RiceWR KC | 0.346Solid | 11.7 | — | 407 |
| 9 |  Tank DellWRHOU | 0.334Solid | 15.0 | — | 494 |
| 10 |  Ja'Marr ChaseWR CIN | 0.332Solid | 19.4 | 29% | 703 |
| 11 |  Deebo Samuel Sr.WR SF | 0.328Solid | 15.5 | — | 472 |
| 12 |  Stefon DiggsWR BUF | 0.321Solid | 19.0 | 31% | 710 |
| 13 |  Brandon AiyukWRSF | 0.320Solid | 16.2 | 26% | 558 |
| 14 |  Amon-Ra St. BrownWR DET | 0.317Solid | 20.3 | 31% | 704 |
| 15 |  Jamison CrowderWR WSH | 0.314Solid | 2.8 | — | 115 |
| 16 |  A.J. BrownWR PHI | 0.311Solid | 19.9 | 33% | 771 |
| 17 |  Jaylen WaddleWRMIA | 0.311Solid | 13.7 | 26% | 483 |
| 18 |  Jayden ReedWR GB | 0.307Solid | 11.5 | — | 447 |
| 19 |  Kalif RaymondWRDET | 0.306Solid | 6.3 | — | 248 |
| 20 |  DeAndre HopkinsWR TEN | 0.304Solid | 13.2 | 28% | 520 |
| 21 |  Mike WilliamsWRLAC | 0.301Solid | 16.7 | — | 167 |
| 22 |  Puka NacuaWR LAR | 0.300Solid | 17.4 | 31% | 694 |
| 23 |  DK MetcalfWR SEA | 0.290Rotational | 15.1 | — | 574 |
| 24 |  Curtis SamuelWRWSH | 0.279Rotational | 10.2 | — | 437 |
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.606Elite
- PPR per game
- 26.1
- Target share
- 36%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 516
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.511Elite
- PPR per game
- 5.0
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 108
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.389Strong
- PPR per game
- 22.1
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 680
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.378Strong
- PPR per game
- 18.5
- Target share
- 27%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 588
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.373Strong
- PPR per game
- 22.2
- Target share
- 32%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 714
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.367Strong
- PPR per game
- 21.8
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 297
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.355Strong
- PPR per game
- 17.6
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 546
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.346Solid
- PPR per game
- 11.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 407
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.334Solid
- PPR per game
- 15.0
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 494
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.332Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.4
- Target share
- 29%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 703
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.328Solid
- PPR per game
- 15.5
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 472
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.321Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.0
- Target share
- 31%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 710
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.320Solid
- PPR per game
- 16.2
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 558
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.317Solid
- PPR per game
- 20.3
- Target share
- 31%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 704
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.314Solid
- PPR per game
- 2.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 115
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.311Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.9
- Target share
- 33%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 771
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.311Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.7
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 483
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.307Solid
- PPR per game
- 11.5
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 447
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.306Solid
- PPR per game
- 6.3
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 248
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.304Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.2
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 520
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.301Solid
- PPR per game
- 16.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 167
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.300Solid
- PPR per game
- 17.4
- Target share
- 31%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 694
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.290Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.1
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 574
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.279Rotational
- PPR per game
- 10.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 437
PPR per snap is our sanctioned proxy for FP per route run. tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate it — offensive snaps are the in-house denominator (per opportunity, independent of playing time). Because snaps include non-route plays, these values run lower than the per-route benchmarks @FantasyPtsData posts (Tyreek 0.85, Puka 0.75 FP/route) — different denominator, not comparable. Bands are our own 2023–25 WR distribution. Historical, descriptive — not a projection. How it works →