Loading…
WR Efficiency Leaderboard
The most efficient WRs by PPR per snap — points produced per opportunity.
ProxyPPR per snap, not FP per route run.tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate a route denominator — offensive snaps stand in (points produced per opportunity, independent of playing time). Values run lower than per-route benchmarks; the bands are our own field.
Season-to-date2023 full season, Weeks 1–18Complete-to-date totals across the full season.
Efficiency bandsElite≥ 0.40Strong≥ 0.35Solid≥ 0.30Rotational< 0.30PPR per snap · from our 2023–25 qualified-WR field
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
| # | Player | PPR/snap | PPR/g | Tgt% | Snaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Tyreek HillWR MIA | 0.542Elite | 23.5 | 36% | 695 |
| 2 |  KaVontae TurpinWR DAL | 0.426Elite | 3.7 | — | 140 |
| 3 |  CeeDee LambWRDAL | 0.407Elite | 23.7 | 30% | 991 |
| 4 |  Nico CollinsWR HOU | 0.389Strong | 17.4 | — | 669 |
| 5 |  Jayden ReedWR GB | 0.376Strong | 13.6 | — | 578 |
| 6 |  Justin JeffersonWR MIN | 0.368Strong | 20.2 | 28% | 550 |
| 7 |  Keenan AllenWR LAC | 0.358Strong | 21.5 | 31% | 779 |
| 8 |  Deebo Samuel Sr.WR SF | 0.344Solid | 16.2 | — | 708 |
| 9 |  Rashee RiceWR KC | 0.342Solid | 13.3 | — | 622 |
| 10 |  Tank DellWRHOU | 0.334Solid | 15.0 | — | 494 |
| 11 |  Bo MeltonWRGB | 0.330Solid | 9.2 | — | 139 |
| 12 |  Amon-Ra St. BrownWR DET | 0.328Solid | 20.7 | 30% | 1,010 |
| 13 |  Mike EvansWR TB | 0.327Solid | 16.6 | 25% | 863 |
| 14 |  Jaylen WaddleWRMIA | 0.325Solid | 14.2 | 26% | 611 |
| 15 |  Brandon AiyukWRSF | 0.310Solid | 15.6 | 26% | 803 |
| 16 |  Mike WilliamsWRLAC | 0.301Solid | 16.7 | — | 167 |
| 17 |  Puka NacuaWR LAR | 0.298Rotational | 17.6 | 30% | 1,000 |
| 18 |  Ja'Marr ChaseWR CIN | 0.295Rotational | 16.4 | 26% | 890 |
| 19 |  DeAndre HopkinsWR TEN | 0.295Rotational | 13.2 | 29% | 758 |
| 20 |  Stefon DiggsWR BUF | 0.289Rotational | 16.1 | 31% | 949 |
| 21 |  A.J. BrownWR PHI | 0.284Rotational | 17.0 | 31% | 1,019 |
| 22 |  Chris OlaveWR NO | 0.284Rotational | 14.5 | 30% | 814 |
| 23 |  Kalif RaymondWRDET | 0.280Rotational | 5.7 | — | 348 |
| 24 |  DJ MooreWR CHI | 0.278Rotational | 16.9 | 31% | 1,029 |
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.542Elite
- PPR per game
- 23.5
- Target share
- 36%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 695
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.426Elite
- PPR per game
- 3.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 140
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.407Elite
- PPR per game
- 23.7
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 991
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.389Strong
- PPR per game
- 17.4
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 669
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.376Strong
- PPR per game
- 13.6
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 578
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.368Strong
- PPR per game
- 20.2
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 550
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.358Strong
- PPR per game
- 21.5
- Target share
- 31%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 779
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.344Solid
- PPR per game
- 16.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 708
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.342Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.3
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 622
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.334Solid
- PPR per game
- 15.0
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 494
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.330Solid
- PPR per game
- 9.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 139
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.328Solid
- PPR per game
- 20.7
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 1,010
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.327Solid
- PPR per game
- 16.6
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 863
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.325Solid
- PPR per game
- 14.2
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 611
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.310Solid
- PPR per game
- 15.6
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 803
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.301Solid
- PPR per game
- 16.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 167
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.298Rotational
- PPR per game
- 17.6
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 1,000
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.295Rotational
- PPR per game
- 16.4
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 890
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.295Rotational
- PPR per game
- 13.2
- Target share
- 29%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 758
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.289Rotational
- PPR per game
- 16.1
- Target share
- 31%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 949
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.284Rotational
- PPR per game
- 17.0
- Target share
- 31%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 1,019
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.284Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.5
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 814
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.280Rotational
- PPR per game
- 5.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 348
PPR per snap is our sanctioned proxy for FP per route run. tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate it — offensive snaps are the in-house denominator (per opportunity, independent of playing time). Because snaps include non-route plays, these values run lower than the per-route benchmarks @FantasyPtsData posts (Tyreek 0.85, Puka 0.75 FP/route) — different denominator, not comparable. Bands are our own 2023–25 WR distribution. Historical, descriptive — not a projection. How it works →