Loading…
WR Efficiency Leaderboard
The most efficient WRs by PPR per snap — points produced per opportunity.
ProxyPPR per snap, not FP per route run.tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate a route denominator — offensive snaps stand in (points produced per opportunity, independent of playing time). Values run lower than per-route benchmarks; the bands are our own field.
As-of weekAs of Week 3, 2024Point-in-time: aggregates Weeks 1–3 only.
Efficiency bandsElite≥ 0.40Strong≥ 0.35Solid≥ 0.30Rotational< 0.30PPR per snap · from our 2023–25 qualified-WR field
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
| # | Player | PPR/snap | PPR/g | Tgt% | Snaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Jauan JenningsWR SF | 0.478Elite | 21.2 | — | 133 |
| 2 |  Chris GodwinWR TB | 0.463Elite | 21.4 | 32% | 139 |
| 3 |  Rashee RiceWR KC | 0.430Elite | 21.6 | 33% | 151 |
| 4 |  Justin JeffersonWR MIN | 0.421Elite | 19.8 | 30% | 141 |
| 5 |  Jayden ReedWR GB | 0.411Elite | 16.9 | — | 123 |
| 6 |  Cooper KuppWR LAR | 0.378Strong | 19.9 | 33% | 105 |
| 7 |  Malik NabersWR NYG | 0.376Strong | 22.8 | 41% | 182 |
| 8 |  Nico CollinsWR HOU | 0.340Solid | 19.3 | 26% | 170 |
| 9 |  Quentin JohnstonWR LAC | 0.336Solid | 13.8 | — | 123 |
| 10 |  Alec PierceWR IND | 0.325Solid | 14.5 | — | 134 |
| 11 |  Deebo Samuel Sr.WRSF | 0.325Solid | 18.4 | 33% | 113 |
| 12 |  DK MetcalfWR SEA | 0.319Solid | 18.4 | — | 173 |
| 13 |  Marvin Harrison Jr.WR ARI | 0.312Solid | 15.9 | 27% | 153 |
| 14 |  Ja'Marr ChaseWR CIN | 0.304Solid | 16.5 | — | 163 |
| 15 |  Stefon DiggsWRHOU | 0.295Rotational | 16.5 | — | 168 |
| 16 |  Rashid ShaheedWR NO | 0.295Rotational | 12.4 | — | 126 |
| 17 |  Jalen NailorWRMIN | 0.276Rotational | 12.0 | — | 130 |
| 18 |  Allen LazardWR NYJ | 0.275Rotational | 14.6 | — | 159 |
| 19 |  Wan'Dale RobinsonWRNYG | 0.275Rotational | 11.6 | — | 126 |
| 20 |  Tyreek HillWR MIA | 0.268Rotational | 13.2 | — | 148 |
| 21 |  Chris OlaveWRNO | 0.263Rotational | 12.2 | 26% | 139 |
| 22 |  Brian Thomas Jr.WR JAX | 0.262Rotational | 12.0 | — | 137 |
| 23 |  Mike EvansWRTB | 0.262Rotational | 11.3 | — | 130 |
| 24 |  Xavier WorthyWRKC | 0.261Rotational | 10.0 | — | 115 |
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.478Elite
- PPR per game
- 21.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 133
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.463Elite
- PPR per game
- 21.4
- Target share
- 32%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 139
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.430Elite
- PPR per game
- 21.6
- Target share
- 33%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 151
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.421Elite
- PPR per game
- 19.8
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 141
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.411Elite
- PPR per game
- 16.9
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 123
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.378Strong
- PPR per game
- 19.9
- Target share
- 33%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 105
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.376Strong
- PPR per game
- 22.8
- Target share
- 41%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 182
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.340Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.3
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 170
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.336Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 123
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.325Solid
- PPR per game
- 14.5
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 134
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.325Solid
- PPR per game
- 18.4
- Target share
- 33%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 113
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.319Solid
- PPR per game
- 18.4
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 173
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.312Solid
- PPR per game
- 15.9
- Target share
- 27%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 153
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.304Solid
- PPR per game
- 16.5
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 163
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.295Rotational
- PPR per game
- 16.5
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 168
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.295Rotational
- PPR per game
- 12.4
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 126
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.276Rotational
- PPR per game
- 12.0
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 130
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.275Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.6
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 159
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.275Rotational
- PPR per game
- 11.6
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 126
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.268Rotational
- PPR per game
- 13.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 148
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.263Rotational
- PPR per game
- 12.2
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 139
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.262Rotational
- PPR per game
- 12.0
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 137
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.262Rotational
- PPR per game
- 11.3
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 130
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.261Rotational
- PPR per game
- 10.0
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 115
PPR per snap is our sanctioned proxy for FP per route run. tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate it — offensive snaps are the in-house denominator (per opportunity, independent of playing time). Because snaps include non-route plays, these values run lower than the per-route benchmarks @FantasyPtsData posts (Tyreek 0.85, Puka 0.75 FP/route) — different denominator, not comparable. Bands are our own 2023–25 WR distribution. Historical, descriptive — not a projection. How it works →