Loading…
WR Efficiency Leaderboard
The most efficient WRs by PPR per snap — points produced per opportunity.
ProxyPPR per snap, not FP per route run.tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate a route denominator — offensive snaps stand in (points produced per opportunity, independent of playing time). Values run lower than per-route benchmarks; the bands are our own field.
As-of weekAs of Week 4, 2023Point-in-time: aggregates Weeks 1–4 only.
Efficiency bandsElite≥ 0.40Strong≥ 0.35Solid≥ 0.30Rotational< 0.30PPR per snap · from our 2023–25 qualified-WR field
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
| # | Player | PPR/snap | PPR/g | Tgt% | Snaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Tyreek HillWR MIA | 0.546Elite | 25.1 | 32% | 184 |
| 2 |  Brandon AiyukWR SF | 0.469Elite | 20.3 | 28% | 130 |
| 3 |  Stefon DiggsWR BUF | 0.441Elite | 23.7 | 32% | 215 |
| 4 |  Mike EvansWR TB | 0.437Elite | 17.9 | 27% | 164 |
| 5 |  Justin JeffersonWR MIN | 0.420Elite | 25.8 | 34% | 246 |
| 6 |  Keenan AllenWR LAC | 0.419Elite | 25.8 | 29% | 246 |
| 7 |  Nico CollinsWR HOU | 0.418Elite | 20.7 | — | 198 |
| 8 |  Davante AdamsWR LV | 0.407Elite | 22.7 | 38% | 223 |
| 9 |  Puka NacuaWR LAR | 0.363Strong | 23.9 | 32% | 263 |
| 10 |  Romeo DoubsWR GB | 0.326Solid | 15.1 | — | 185 |
| 11 |  Rashee RiceWR KC | 0.317Solid | 8.2 | — | 103 |
| 12 |  Brandon JohnsonWR DEN | 0.313Solid | 9.1 | — | 116 |
| 13 |  A.J. BrownWR PHI | 0.307Solid | 20.6 | 35% | 268 |
| 14 |  Jayden ReedWRGB | 0.307Solid | 11.5 | — | 150 |
| 15 |  Mike WilliamsWRLAC | 0.301Solid | 16.7 | — | 167 |
| 16 |  Tank DellWRHOU | 0.299Rotational | 14.0 | — | 187 |
| 17 |  Michael WilsonWR ARI | 0.284Rotational | 12.4 | — | 175 |
| 18 |  DK MetcalfWR SEA | 0.283Rotational | 14.2 | — | 201 |
| 19 |  CeeDee LambWR DAL | 0.282Rotational | 15.5 | — | 220 |
| 20 |  Amon-Ra St. BrownWR DET | 0.281Rotational | 17.4 | 30% | 247 |
| 21 |  Jakobi MeyersWRLV | 0.279Rotational | 16.6 | 26% | 179 |
| 22 |  Braxton BerriosWRMIA | 0.278Rotational | 8.7 | — | 125 |
| 23 |  Adam ThielenWR CAR | 0.272Rotational | 17.6 | — | 258 |
| 24 |  Jordan AddisonWRMIN | 0.269Rotational | 10.9 | — | 162 |
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.546Elite
- PPR per game
- 25.1
- Target share
- 32%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 184
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.469Elite
- PPR per game
- 20.3
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 130
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.441Elite
- PPR per game
- 23.7
- Target share
- 32%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 215
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.437Elite
- PPR per game
- 17.9
- Target share
- 27%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 164
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.420Elite
- PPR per game
- 25.8
- Target share
- 34%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 246
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.419Elite
- PPR per game
- 25.8
- Target share
- 29%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 246
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.418Elite
- PPR per game
- 20.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 198
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.407Elite
- PPR per game
- 22.7
- Target share
- 38%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 223
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.363Strong
- PPR per game
- 23.9
- Target share
- 32%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 263
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.326Solid
- PPR per game
- 15.1
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 185
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.317Solid
- PPR per game
- 8.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 103
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.313Solid
- PPR per game
- 9.1
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 116
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.307Solid
- PPR per game
- 20.6
- Target share
- 35%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 268
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.307Solid
- PPR per game
- 11.5
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 150
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.301Solid
- PPR per game
- 16.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 167
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.299Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.0
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 187
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.284Rotational
- PPR per game
- 12.4
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 175
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.283Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 201
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.282Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.5
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 220
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.281Rotational
- PPR per game
- 17.4
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 247
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.279Rotational
- PPR per game
- 16.6
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 179
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.278Rotational
- PPR per game
- 8.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 125
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.272Rotational
- PPR per game
- 17.6
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 258
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.269Rotational
- PPR per game
- 10.9
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 162
PPR per snap is our sanctioned proxy for FP per route run. tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate it — offensive snaps are the in-house denominator (per opportunity, independent of playing time). Because snaps include non-route plays, these values run lower than the per-route benchmarks @FantasyPtsData posts (Tyreek 0.85, Puka 0.75 FP/route) — different denominator, not comparable. Bands are our own 2023–25 WR distribution. Historical, descriptive — not a projection. How it works →