Loading…
WR Efficiency Leaderboard
The most efficient WRs by PPR per snap — points produced per opportunity.
ProxyPPR per snap, not FP per route run.tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate a route denominator — offensive snaps stand in (points produced per opportunity, independent of playing time). Values run lower than per-route benchmarks; the bands are our own field.
As-of weekAs of Week 10, 2023Point-in-time: aggregates Weeks 1–10 only.
Efficiency bandsElite≥ 0.40Strong≥ 0.35Solid≥ 0.30Rotational< 0.30PPR per snap · from our 2023–25 qualified-WR field
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
| # | Player | PPR/snap | PPR/g | Tgt% | Snaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Tyreek HillWR MIA | 0.561Elite | 24.9 | 36% | 400 |
| 2 |  CeeDee LambWR DAL | 0.404Elite | 22.0 | 27% | 491 |
| 3 |  Keenan AllenWR LAC | 0.384Strong | 22.8 | 30% | 534 |
| 4 |  Justin JeffersonWR MIN | 0.367Strong | 21.8 | 30% | 297 |
| 5 |  Stefon DiggsWR BUF | 0.359Strong | 20.2 | 32% | 562 |
| 6 |  Mike EvansWR TB | 0.358Strong | 17.0 | — | 426 |
| 7 |  A.J. BrownWR PHI | 0.343Solid | 22.6 | 34% | 594 |
| 8 |  Rashee RiceWR KC | 0.339Solid | 10.4 | — | 276 |
| 9 |  Ja'Marr ChaseWR CIN | 0.337Solid | 20.1 | 30% | 535 |
| 10 |  Amon-Ra St. BrownWR DET | 0.325Solid | 21.3 | 32% | 524 |
| 11 |  Jaylen WaddleWRMIA | 0.325Solid | 13.9 | — | 342 |
| 12 |  Brandon AiyukWR SF | 0.313Solid | 15.4 | 28% | 395 |
| 13 |  Nico CollinsWR HOU | 0.312Solid | 15.4 | — | 394 |
| 14 |  Tank DellWRHOU | 0.308Solid | 14.9 | — | 386 |
| 15 |  Mike WilliamsWRLAC | 0.301Solid | 16.7 | — | 167 |
| 16 |  Jayden ReedWR GB | 0.299Rotational | 10.8 | — | 326 |
| 17 |  Noah BrownWRHOU | 0.299Rotational | 14.2 | — | 237 |
| 18 |  Kalif RaymondWRDET | 0.297Rotational | 6.5 | — | 198 |
| 19 |  Puka NacuaWR LAR | 0.294Rotational | 17.7 | 33% | 541 |
| 20 |  DeAndre HopkinsWR TEN | 0.289Rotational | 12.8 | 28% | 400 |
| 21 |  Jordan AddisonWRMIN | 0.279Rotational | 14.8 | — | 529 |
| 22 |  Adam ThielenWR CAR | 0.276Rotational | 17.8 | 27% | 579 |
| 23 |  Deebo Samuel Sr.WRSF | 0.272Rotational | 12.5 | — | 322 |
| 24 |  Kadarius ToneyWRKC | 0.271Rotational | 4.2 | — | 141 |
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.561Elite
- PPR per game
- 24.9
- Target share
- 36%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 400
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.404Elite
- PPR per game
- 22.0
- Target share
- 27%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 491
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.384Strong
- PPR per game
- 22.8
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 534
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.367Strong
- PPR per game
- 21.8
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 297
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.359Strong
- PPR per game
- 20.2
- Target share
- 32%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 562
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.358Strong
- PPR per game
- 17.0
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 426
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.343Solid
- PPR per game
- 22.6
- Target share
- 34%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 594
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.339Solid
- PPR per game
- 10.4
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 276
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.337Solid
- PPR per game
- 20.1
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 535
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.325Solid
- PPR per game
- 21.3
- Target share
- 32%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 524
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.325Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.9
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 342
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.313Solid
- PPR per game
- 15.4
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 395
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.312Solid
- PPR per game
- 15.4
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 394
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.308Solid
- PPR per game
- 14.9
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 386
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.301Solid
- PPR per game
- 16.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 167
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.299Rotational
- PPR per game
- 10.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 326
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.299Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 237
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.297Rotational
- PPR per game
- 6.5
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 198
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.294Rotational
- PPR per game
- 17.7
- Target share
- 33%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 541
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.289Rotational
- PPR per game
- 12.8
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 400
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.279Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 529
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.276Rotational
- PPR per game
- 17.8
- Target share
- 27%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 579
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.272Rotational
- PPR per game
- 12.5
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 322
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.271Rotational
- PPR per game
- 4.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 141
PPR per snap is our sanctioned proxy for FP per route run. tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate it — offensive snaps are the in-house denominator (per opportunity, independent of playing time). Because snaps include non-route plays, these values run lower than the per-route benchmarks @FantasyPtsData posts (Tyreek 0.85, Puka 0.75 FP/route) — different denominator, not comparable. Bands are our own 2023–25 WR distribution. Historical, descriptive — not a projection. How it works →