Loading…
WR Efficiency Leaderboard
The most efficient WRs by PPR per snap — points produced per opportunity.
ProxyPPR per snap, not FP per route run.tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate a route denominator — offensive snaps stand in (points produced per opportunity, independent of playing time). Values run lower than per-route benchmarks; the bands are our own field.
As-of weekAs of Week 7, 2023Point-in-time: aggregates Weeks 1–7 only.
Efficiency bandsElite≥ 0.40Strong≥ 0.35Solid≥ 0.30Rotational< 0.30PPR per snap · from our 2023–25 qualified-WR field
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
| # | Player | PPR/snap | PPR/g | Tgt% | Snaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Tyreek HillWR MIA | 0.655Elite | 26.7 | 36% | 285 |
| 2 |  Stefon DiggsWR BUF | 0.406Elite | 22.4 | 35% | 386 |
| 3 |  Marvin Mims Jr.WR DEN | 0.390Strong | 6.4 | — | 115 |
| 4 |  Mike EvansWR TB | 0.379Strong | 16.8 | 26% | 266 |
| 5 |  Rashee RiceWR KC | 0.375Strong | 10.6 | — | 198 |
| 6 |  Justin JeffersonWR MIN | 0.367Strong | 21.8 | 30% | 297 |
| 7 |  Keenan AllenWR LAC | 0.357Strong | 22.3 | 30% | 375 |
| 8 |  Nico CollinsWR HOU | 0.345Solid | 16.9 | — | 295 |
| 9 |  Ja'Marr ChaseWR CIN | 0.342Solid | 20.6 | 33% | 362 |
| 10 |  Puka NacuaWR LAR | 0.333Solid | 20.8 | 35% | 437 |
| 11 |  Jordan AddisonWRMIN | 0.331Solid | 15.0 | — | 317 |
| 12 |  Adam ThielenWR CAR | 0.330Solid | 21.1 | 27% | 383 |
| 13 |  DJ MooreWR CHI | 0.321Solid | 19.1 | 31% | 416 |
| 14 |  Amon-Ra St. BrownWR DET | 0.321Solid | 20.5 | 33% | 384 |
| 15 |  A.J. BrownWR PHI | 0.320Solid | 21.6 | 34% | 472 |
| 16 |  Brandon AiyukWR SF | 0.311Solid | 15.5 | 30% | 299 |
| 17 |  Jaylen WaddleWRMIA | 0.311Solid | 13.0 | — | 250 |
| 18 |  Tank DellWRHOU | 0.309Solid | 12.9 | — | 208 |
| 19 |  Cooper KuppWRLAR | 0.306Solid | 18.2 | 36% | 178 |
| 20 |  Mike WilliamsWRLAC | 0.301Solid | 16.7 | — | 167 |
| 21 |  Kalif RaymondWRDET | 0.301Solid | 6.9 | — | 160 |
| 22 |  Deonte HartyWRBUF | 0.299Rotational | 4.4 | — | 102 |
| 23 |  Davante AdamsWR LV | 0.295Rotational | 16.7 | 30% | 396 |
| 24 |  CeeDee LambWR DAL | 0.291Rotational | 14.9 | — | 308 |
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.655Elite
- PPR per game
- 26.7
- Target share
- 36%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 285
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.406Elite
- PPR per game
- 22.4
- Target share
- 35%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 386
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.390Strong
- PPR per game
- 6.4
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 115
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.379Strong
- PPR per game
- 16.8
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 266
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.375Strong
- PPR per game
- 10.6
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 198
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.367Strong
- PPR per game
- 21.8
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 297
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.357Strong
- PPR per game
- 22.3
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 375
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.345Solid
- PPR per game
- 16.9
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 295
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.342Solid
- PPR per game
- 20.6
- Target share
- 33%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 362
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.333Solid
- PPR per game
- 20.8
- Target share
- 35%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 437
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.331Solid
- PPR per game
- 15.0
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 317
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.330Solid
- PPR per game
- 21.1
- Target share
- 27%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 383
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.321Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.1
- Target share
- 31%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 416
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.321Solid
- PPR per game
- 20.5
- Target share
- 33%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 384
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.320Solid
- PPR per game
- 21.6
- Target share
- 34%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 472
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.311Solid
- PPR per game
- 15.5
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 299
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.311Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.0
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 250
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.309Solid
- PPR per game
- 12.9
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 208
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.306Solid
- PPR per game
- 18.2
- Target share
- 36%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 178
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.301Solid
- PPR per game
- 16.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 167
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.301Solid
- PPR per game
- 6.9
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 160
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.299Rotational
- PPR per game
- 4.4
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 102
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.295Rotational
- PPR per game
- 16.7
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 396
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.291Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.9
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 308
PPR per snap is our sanctioned proxy for FP per route run. tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate it — offensive snaps are the in-house denominator (per opportunity, independent of playing time). Because snaps include non-route plays, these values run lower than the per-route benchmarks @FantasyPtsData posts (Tyreek 0.85, Puka 0.75 FP/route) — different denominator, not comparable. Bands are our own 2023–25 WR distribution. Historical, descriptive — not a projection. How it works →