Loading…
WR Efficiency Leaderboard
The most efficient WRs by PPR per snap — points produced per opportunity.
ProxyPPR per snap, not FP per route run.tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate a route denominator — offensive snaps stand in (points produced per opportunity, independent of playing time). Values run lower than per-route benchmarks; the bands are our own field.
As-of weekAs of Week 9, 2023Point-in-time: aggregates Weeks 1–9 only.
Efficiency bandsElite≥ 0.40Strong≥ 0.35Solid≥ 0.30Rotational< 0.30PPR per snap · from our 2023–25 qualified-WR field
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
| # | Player | PPR/snap | PPR/g | Tgt% | Snaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Tyreek HillWR MIA | 0.561Elite | 24.9 | 36% | 400 |
| 2 |  Stefon DiggsWR BUF | 0.384Strong | 21.7 | 33% | 509 |
| 3 |  CeeDee LambWR DAL | 0.368Strong | 19.8 | 26% | 431 |
| 4 |  Justin JeffersonWR MIN | 0.367Strong | 21.8 | 30% | 297 |
| 5 |  A.J. BrownWR PHI | 0.343Solid | 22.6 | 34% | 594 |
| 6 |  Keenan AllenWR LAC | 0.343Solid | 20.6 | 29% | 480 |
| 7 |  Rashee RiceWR KC | 0.339Solid | 10.4 | — | 276 |
| 8 |  Mike EvansWR TB | 0.334Solid | 15.8 | — | 379 |
| 9 |  Ja'Marr ChaseWR CIN | 0.327Solid | 19.6 | 32% | 481 |
| 10 |  Jaylen WaddleWRMIA | 0.325Solid | 13.9 | — | 342 |
| 11 |  Diontae JohnsonWR PIT | 0.322Solid | 14.8 | 30% | 184 |
| 12 |  Marvin Mims Jr.WR DEN | 0.320Solid | 5.7 | — | 143 |
| 13 |  Tank DellWR HOU | 0.318Solid | 14.3 | — | 314 |
| 14 |  DeAndre HopkinsWR TEN | 0.314Solid | 13.7 | 28% | 350 |
| 15 |  Nico CollinsWRHOU | 0.312Solid | 15.4 | — | 394 |
| 16 |  Brandon AiyukWR SF | 0.309Solid | 15.6 | 30% | 353 |
| 17 |  Amon-Ra St. BrownWR DET | 0.302Solid | 20.0 | 32% | 463 |
| 18 |  Mike WilliamsWRLAC | 0.301Solid | 16.7 | — | 167 |
| 19 |  Jordan AddisonWRMIN | 0.298Rotational | 15.2 | — | 458 |
| 20 |  Puka NacuaWR LAR | 0.294Rotational | 17.7 | 33% | 541 |
| 21 |  Kalif RaymondWRDET | 0.289Rotational | 6.5 | — | 181 |
| 22 |  Adam ThielenWR CAR | 0.288Rotational | 18.7 | 27% | 519 |
| 23 |  Curtis SamuelWR WSH | 0.277Rotational | 11.0 | — | 318 |
| 24 |  DJ MooreWR CHI | 0.275Rotational | 16.5 | 28% | 540 |
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.561Elite
- PPR per game
- 24.9
- Target share
- 36%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 400
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.384Strong
- PPR per game
- 21.7
- Target share
- 33%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 509
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.368Strong
- PPR per game
- 19.8
- Target share
- 26%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 431
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.367Strong
- PPR per game
- 21.8
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 297
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.343Solid
- PPR per game
- 22.6
- Target share
- 34%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 594
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.343Solid
- PPR per game
- 20.6
- Target share
- 29%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 480
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.339Solid
- PPR per game
- 10.4
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 276
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.334Solid
- PPR per game
- 15.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 379
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.327Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.6
- Target share
- 32%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 481
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.325Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.9
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 342
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.322Solid
- PPR per game
- 14.8
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 184
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.320Solid
- PPR per game
- 5.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 143
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.318Solid
- PPR per game
- 14.3
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 314
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.314Solid
- PPR per game
- 13.7
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 350
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.312Solid
- PPR per game
- 15.4
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 394
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.309Solid
- PPR per game
- 15.6
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 353
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.302Solid
- PPR per game
- 20.0
- Target share
- 32%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 463
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.301Solid
- PPR per game
- 16.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 167
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.298Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 458
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.294Rotational
- PPR per game
- 17.7
- Target share
- 33%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 541
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.289Rotational
- PPR per game
- 6.5
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 181
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.288Rotational
- PPR per game
- 18.7
- Target share
- 27%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 519
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.277Rotational
- PPR per game
- 11.0
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 318
PPR per snap is our sanctioned proxy for FP per route run. tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate it — offensive snaps are the in-house denominator (per opportunity, independent of playing time). Because snaps include non-route plays, these values run lower than the per-route benchmarks @FantasyPtsData posts (Tyreek 0.85, Puka 0.75 FP/route) — different denominator, not comparable. Bands are our own 2023–25 WR distribution. Historical, descriptive — not a projection. How it works →