Loading…
WR Efficiency Leaderboard
The most efficient WRs by PPR per snap — points produced per opportunity.
ProxyPPR per snap, not FP per route run.tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate a route denominator — offensive snaps stand in (points produced per opportunity, independent of playing time). Values run lower than per-route benchmarks; the bands are our own field.
As-of weekAs of Week 8, 2023Point-in-time: aggregates Weeks 1–8 only.
Efficiency bandsElite≥ 0.40Strong≥ 0.35Solid≥ 0.30Rotational< 0.30PPR per snap · from our 2023–25 qualified-WR field
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
| # | Player | PPR/snap | PPR/g | Tgt% | Snaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Tyreek HillWR MIA | 0.617Elite | 26.5 | 36% | 343 |
| 2 |  Stefon DiggsWR BUF | 0.381Strong | 21.6 | 35% | 454 |
| 3 |  Justin JeffersonWR MIN | 0.367Strong | 21.8 | 30% | 297 |
| 4 |  CeeDee LambWR DAL | 0.362Strong | 18.7 | — | 361 |
| 5 |  Rashee RiceWR KC | 0.357Strong | 10.5 | — | 235 |
| 6 |  Ja'Marr ChaseWR CIN | 0.356Strong | 21.3 | 33% | 418 |
| 7 |  Mike EvansWR TB | 0.351Strong | 16.2 | — | 324 |
| 8 |  Keenan AllenWR LAC | 0.346Solid | 21.3 | 29% | 430 |
| 9 |  A.J. BrownWR PHI | 0.344Solid | 23.0 | 33% | 534 |
| 10 |  Jaylen WaddleWRMIA | 0.334Solid | 14.7 | 25% | 308 |
| 11 |  DeAndre HopkinsWR TEN | 0.332Solid | 14.2 | 28% | 299 |
| 12 |  Jordan AddisonWRMIN | 0.328Solid | 15.8 | — | 385 |
| 13 |  Nico CollinsWR HOU | 0.323Solid | 15.5 | — | 337 |
| 14 |  Marvin Mims Jr.WR DEN | 0.320Solid | 5.7 | — | 143 |
| 15 |  Adam ThielenWR CAR | 0.316Solid | 20.2 | 28% | 448 |
| 16 |  Puka NacuaWR LAR | 0.310Solid | 19.1 | 34% | 494 |
| 17 |  Brandon AiyukWR SF | 0.309Solid | 15.6 | 30% | 353 |
| 18 |  DJ MooreWR CHI | 0.302Solid | 17.9 | 29% | 474 |
| 19 |  Amon-Ra St. BrownWR DET | 0.302Solid | 20.0 | 32% | 463 |
| 20 |  Mike WilliamsWRLAC | 0.301Solid | 16.7 | — | 167 |
| 21 |  Diontae JohnsonWR PIT | 0.293Rotational | 12.4 | 29% | 127 |
| 22 |  Kalif RaymondWRDET | 0.289Rotational | 6.5 | — | 181 |
| 23 |  Rashid ShaheedWR NO | 0.284Rotational | 12.0 | — | 339 |
| 24 |  Deonte HartyWRBUF | 0.282Rotational | 3.8 | — | 108 |
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.617Elite
- PPR per game
- 26.5
- Target share
- 36%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 343
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.381Strong
- PPR per game
- 21.6
- Target share
- 35%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 454
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.367Strong
- PPR per game
- 21.8
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 297
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.362Strong
- PPR per game
- 18.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 361
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.357Strong
- PPR per game
- 10.5
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 235
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.356Strong
- PPR per game
- 21.3
- Target share
- 33%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 418
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.351Strong
- PPR per game
- 16.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 324
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.346Solid
- PPR per game
- 21.3
- Target share
- 29%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 430
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.344Solid
- PPR per game
- 23.0
- Target share
- 33%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 534
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.334Solid
- PPR per game
- 14.7
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 308
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.332Solid
- PPR per game
- 14.2
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 299
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.328Solid
- PPR per game
- 15.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 385
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.323Solid
- PPR per game
- 15.5
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 337
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.320Solid
- PPR per game
- 5.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 143
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.316Solid
- PPR per game
- 20.2
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 448
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.310Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.1
- Target share
- 34%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 494
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.309Solid
- PPR per game
- 15.6
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 353
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.302Solid
- PPR per game
- 17.9
- Target share
- 29%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 474
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.302Solid
- PPR per game
- 20.0
- Target share
- 32%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 463
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.301Solid
- PPR per game
- 16.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 167
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.293Rotational
- PPR per game
- 12.4
- Target share
- 29%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 127
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.289Rotational
- PPR per game
- 6.5
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 181
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.284Rotational
- PPR per game
- 12.0
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 339
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.282Rotational
- PPR per game
- 3.8
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 108
PPR per snap is our sanctioned proxy for FP per route run. tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate it — offensive snaps are the in-house denominator (per opportunity, independent of playing time). Because snaps include non-route plays, these values run lower than the per-route benchmarks @FantasyPtsData posts (Tyreek 0.85, Puka 0.75 FP/route) — different denominator, not comparable. Bands are our own 2023–25 WR distribution. Historical, descriptive — not a projection. How it works →