Loading…
WR Efficiency Leaderboard
The most efficient WRs by PPR per snap — points produced per opportunity.
ProxyPPR per snap, not FP per route run.tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate a route denominator — offensive snaps stand in (points produced per opportunity, independent of playing time). Values run lower than per-route benchmarks; the bands are our own field.
As-of weekAs of Week 5, 2023Point-in-time: aggregates Weeks 1–5 only.
Efficiency bandsElite≥ 0.40Strong≥ 0.35Solid≥ 0.30Rotational< 0.30PPR per snap · from our 2023–25 qualified-WR field
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
| # | Player | PPR/snap | PPR/g | Tgt% | Snaps |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |  Tyreek HillWR MIA | 0.634Elite | 26.5 | 32% | 209 |
| 2 |  Stefon DiggsWR BUF | 0.446Elite | 23.8 | 32% | 267 |
| 3 |  Mike EvansWR TB | 0.437Elite | 17.9 | 27% | 164 |
| 4 |  Keenan AllenWR LAC | 0.419Elite | 25.8 | 29% | 246 |
| 5 |  Brandon AiyukWR SF | 0.381Strong | 17.7 | 29% | 186 |
| 6 |  DJ MooreWR CHI | 0.380Strong | 22.0 | 29% | 290 |
| 7 |  Rashee RiceWR KC | 0.374Strong | 9.2 | — | 123 |
| 8 |  Justin JeffersonWR MIN | 0.367Strong | 21.8 | 30% | 297 |
| 9 |  Puka NacuaWR LAR | 0.362Strong | 23.1 | 32% | 319 |
| 10 |  Nico CollinsWR HOU | 0.360Strong | 17.9 | — | 249 |
| 11 |  Ja'Marr ChaseWR CIN | 0.351Strong | 22.0 | 32% | 313 |
| 12 |  Davante AdamsWR LV | 0.351Strong | 19.8 | 33% | 283 |
| 13 |  Kalif RaymondWR DET | 0.326Solid | 7.7 | — | 118 |
| 14 |  Tank DellWRHOU | 0.309Solid | 12.9 | — | 208 |
| 15 |  Mike WilliamsWRLAC | 0.301Solid | 16.7 | — | 167 |
| 16 |  Adam ThielenWR CAR | 0.300Solid | 19.6 | 25% | 327 |
| 17 |  DeAndre HopkinsWR TEN | 0.296Rotational | 12.3 | 30% | 208 |
| 18 |  Jakobi MeyersWRLV | 0.293Rotational | 17.6 | 28% | 240 |
| 19 |  A.J. BrownWR PHI | 0.292Rotational | 20.2 | 33% | 346 |
| 20 |  Jordan AddisonWRMIN | 0.287Rotational | 12.4 | — | 216 |
| 21 |  DK MetcalfWR SEA | 0.283Rotational | 14.2 | — | 201 |
| 22 |  Amon-Ra St. BrownWRDET | 0.281Rotational | 17.4 | 30% | 247 |
| 23 |  CeeDee LambWR DAL | 0.279Rotational | 14.2 | — | 254 |
| 24 |  George PickensWR PIT | 0.274Rotational | 15.0 | 28% | 273 |
Most efficient WRs · PPR per snap
Per-route proxy — points produced per opportunity
24 WRs
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.634Elite
- PPR per game
- 26.5
- Target share
- 32%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 209
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.446Elite
- PPR per game
- 23.8
- Target share
- 32%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 267
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.437Elite
- PPR per game
- 17.9
- Target share
- 27%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 164
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.419Elite
- PPR per game
- 25.8
- Target share
- 29%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 246
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.381Strong
- PPR per game
- 17.7
- Target share
- 29%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 186
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.380Strong
- PPR per game
- 22.0
- Target share
- 29%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 290
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.374Strong
- PPR per game
- 9.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 123
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.367Strong
- PPR per game
- 21.8
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 297
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.362Strong
- PPR per game
- 23.1
- Target share
- 32%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 319
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.360Strong
- PPR per game
- 17.9
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 249
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.351Strong
- PPR per game
- 22.0
- Target share
- 32%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 313
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.351Strong
- PPR per game
- 19.8
- Target share
- 33%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 283
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.326Solid
- PPR per game
- 7.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 118
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.309Solid
- PPR per game
- 12.9
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 208
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.301Solid
- PPR per game
- 16.7
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 167
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.300Solid
- PPR per game
- 19.6
- Target share
- 25%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 327
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.296Rotational
- PPR per game
- 12.3
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 208
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.293Rotational
- PPR per game
- 17.6
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 240
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.292Rotational
- PPR per game
- 20.2
- Target share
- 33%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 346
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.287Rotational
- PPR per game
- 12.4
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 216
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.283Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 201
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.281Rotational
- PPR per game
- 17.4
- Target share
- 30%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 247
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.279Rotational
- PPR per game
- 14.2
- Target share
- —
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 254
- PPR per snap (per-route proxy)
- 0.274Rotational
- PPR per game
- 15.0
- Target share
- 28%
- Offensive snaps (volume)
- 273
PPR per snap is our sanctioned proxy for FP per route run. tank01 doesn’t chart routes run, so we never fabricate it — offensive snaps are the in-house denominator (per opportunity, independent of playing time). Because snaps include non-route plays, these values run lower than the per-route benchmarks @FantasyPtsData posts (Tyreek 0.85, Puka 0.75 FP/route) — different denominator, not comparable. Bands are our own 2023–25 WR distribution. Historical, descriptive — not a projection. How it works →