
Why: heavy usage, soft matchup






vs LAC: allows 18.4 PPR/g to RB, rank 30/32 (Tough). Trailing RB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Geno Smith. 2025 share of pass targets to RB (95/489). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (RB15), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
Small sample (2 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
RBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
Over/under: 48.3 (4th highest) Win probability: Texans 53% (15th highest) Miami Dolphins @ Las Vegas Raiders Projected score: Raiders 24, Dolphins 18 Lineup locks: Ashton Jeanty, De'Von Achane, Brock Bowers Fantasy scoop: Jeanty (ankle) is
source ↗| Week | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W1 | vs | 23 | 102 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 45 | 2 | 0% | 21% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W18 | vs | 26 | 87 | 0 | 5 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 97% | 19% | 12.4 | 10.9 | 9.4 |
| 2025 W17 | vs | 16 | 60 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 81% | 7% | 9.3 | 8.3 | 7.3 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 24 | 128 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 60 | 1 | 93% | 9% | 31.8 | 31.3 | 30.8 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 9 | 35 | 0 | 6 | 4 | 7 | 0 | 71% | 24% | 8.2 | 6.2 | 4.2 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 10 | 30 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 70% | 14% | 5.8 | 4.8 | 3.8 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 15 | 31 | 0 | 8 | 6 | 30 | 0 | 96% | 36% | 12.1 | 9.1 | 6.1 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 17 | 50 | 0 | 8 | 8 | 58 | 1 | 81% | 19% | 24.8 | 20.8 | 16.8 |
| 2025 W11 | vs | 6 | 7 | 0 | 8 | 6 | 27 | 0 | 73% | 21% | 9.4 | 6.4 | 3.4 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 19 | 60 | 1 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 87% | 20% | 15.3 | 13.8 | 12.3 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 13 | 42 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 47 | 1 | 91% | 13% | 19.9 | 17.4 | 14.9 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 6 | 21 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 13 | 0 | 63% | 6% | 4.4 | 3.9 | 3.4 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 23 | 75 | 1 | 4 | 2 | 11 | 0 | 79% | 18% | 16.6 | 15.6 | 14.6 |
| 2025 W5 | @ | 14 | 67 | 0 | 7 | 5 | 42 | 0 | 54% | 19% | 15.9 | 13.4 | 10.9 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 21 | 138 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 17 | 2 | 85% | 10% | 33.5 | 32.5 | 31.5 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 17 | 63 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 61% | 0% | 6.3 | 6.3 | 6.3 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 11 | 43 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 56% | 9% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 19 | 38 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 86% | 6% | – | – | – |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 15 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | START | 13.8 | RB17 (12.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | START | 15.4 | RB24 (9.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | FLEX | 13.0 | RB3 (31.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | FLEX | 13.3 | RB33 (8.2) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W14 | START | 15.4 | RB42 (5.8) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W13 | START | 15.9 | RB24 (12.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | FLEX | 13.5 | RB4 (24.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | START | 15.3 | RB30 (9.4) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W10 | FLEX | 13.7 | RB15 (15.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | START | 15.6 | RB5 (19.9) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade