
Why: limited usage
vs LV: allows 22.5 PPR/g to RB, rank 13/32 (Average). Trailing RB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
No prior games vs LV in the record.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
RBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
- At the running back position, Jackson wonders if there’s a running back on the roster who could unseat Jaylen Wright or Ollie Gordon II for the backup role.
source ↗| Week | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | @ | 9 | 9 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 36% | 5% | 2.1 |
| 2025 W17 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 1 | -1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5% | 0% | -0.1 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W14 | @ | 5 | 17 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25% | 0% | 7.7 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 3 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27% | 0% | 1.0 |
| 2025 W11 | vs | 9 | 45 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 39% | 0% | 10.5 |
| 2025 W10 | vs | 1 | -3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6% | 0% | -0.3 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 2 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 20% | 3% | 1.9 |
| 2025 W8 | @ | 10 | 46 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 20 | 1 | 30% | 4% | 13.6 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 5 | 11 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 31% | 7% | 2.3 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 24% | 3% | 1.2 |
| 2025 W5 | @ | 3 | -2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25% | 0% | -0.2 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 6 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26% | 4% | 1.0 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 9 | 38 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25% | 0% | 9.8 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 1 | 8 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 12% | 3% | – |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 2 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 25% | 3% | – |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 15 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 1.8 | RB63 (2.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 2.8 | RB94 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 5.6 | RB89 (-0.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 4.7 | RB93 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | SIT | 4.6 | RB34 (7.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 6.0 | RB70 (1.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 5.4 | RB25 (10.5) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 5.4 | RB87 (-0.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 5.3 | RB53 (1.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W8 | SIT | 3.3 | RB18 (13.6) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade