
Why: low total
vs JAX: allows 18.3 PPR/g to RB, rank 31/32 (Tough). Trailing RB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
No prior games vs JAX in the record.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 14.
RBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
Because of the direction of the organization and the existing young workhorse in RB Quinshon Judkins, Cabot doesn’t see the team being inclined to bring back Chubb for 2026.
source ↗| Week | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W16 | vs | 8 | 22 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 29 | 0 | 39% | 22% | 10.1 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 12 | 21 | 0 | 4 | 3 | -4 | 0 | 67% | 13% | 4.7 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 14 | 26 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 58 | 0 | 46% | 8% | 9.4 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 23 | 91 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 18 | 0 | 60% | 13% | 15.9 |
| 2025 W12 | @ | 16 | 47 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 49% | 0% | 16.7 |
| 2025 W11 | vs | 17 | 59 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 60% | 8% | 5.9 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 22 | 75 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 52% | 9% | 10.5 |
| 2025 W8 | @ | 9 | 19 | 0 | 3 | 3 | -2 | 0 | 33% | 9% | 4.7 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 25 | 84 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 65% | 0% | 26.4 |
| 2025 W6 | @ | 12 | 36 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 40% | 2% | 3.6 |
| 2025 W5 | vs | 23 | 110 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 18 | 0 | 56% | 6% | 13.8 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 21 | 82 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 33 | 0 | 58% | 12% | 21.5 |
| 2025 W3 | vs | 18 | 94 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 55% | 6% | – |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 10 | 61 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 10 | 0 | 27% | 7% | – |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 12 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W16 | FLEX | 11.2 | RB29 (10.1) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W15 | FLEX | 11.2 | RB49 (4.7) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W14 | FLEX | 12.0 | RB28 (9.4) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 9.5 | RB16 (15.9) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W12 | FLEX | 11.2 | RB10 (16.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | FLEX | 10.1 | RB42 (5.9) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W10 | FLEX | 11.4 | RB26 (10.5) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W8 | FLEX | 13.2 | RB41 (4.7) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W7 | FLEX | 12.2 | RB4 (26.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W6 | FLEX | 12.1 | RB50 (3.6) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade