
Why: limited usage, tough matchup
vs DEN: allows 16.9 PPR/g to RB, rank 32/32 (Tough). Trailing RB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Trevor Lawrence. 2025 share of pass targets to RB (78/539). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (RB72), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
| Game | As | Site | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W16 | @ | 4 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
RBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
LeQuint Allen Jr., RB, JAX (hip): Jacksonville's passing-down back did not practice on Wednesday and saw only limited action on Thursday and Friday.
source ↗| Week | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 18% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W17 | @ | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19% | 0% | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 4 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 30% | 0% | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 4 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 29% | 4% | 2.6 | 2.1 | 1.6 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 0 | 25% | 7% | 2.8 | 1.8 | 0.8 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W12 | @ | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15% | 0% | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| 2025 W11 | vs | 8 | 36 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20% | 0% | 3.6 | 3.6 | 3.6 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 32% | 4% | 1.6 | 1.1 | 0.6 |
| 2025 W9 | @ | 1 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 28% | 3% | 2.1 | 1.6 | 1.1 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 21% | 2% | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.4 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 24% | 5% | 2.2 | 1.7 | 1.2 |
| 2025 W5 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 18% | 3% | 1.7 | 1.2 | 0.7 |
| 2025 W3 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 30% | 3% | 1.9 | 1.4 | 0.9 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 2 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15% | 0% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 1 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 14% | 3% | – | – | – |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 15 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 5.0 | RB93 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 4.7 | RB75 (0.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 3.4 | RB68 (1.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 4.4 | RB58 (2.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | SIT | 3.5 | RB57 (2.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 4.1 | RB97 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 4.7 | RB59 (0.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 3.6 | RB50 (3.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 2.7 | RB56 (1.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 3.4 | RB52 (2.1) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade