
Why: limited usage
vs ARI: allows 26.2 PPR/g to RB, rank 3/32 (Soft). Trailing RB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Sam Darnold. 2025 share of pass targets to RB (62/451). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (RB70), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
Small sample (2 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
RBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W1 | vs | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6% | 0% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W18 | @ | 18 | 44 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 55% | 10% | 5.8 | 5.3 | 4.8 |
| 2025 W17 | vs | 3 | 16 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 36% | 4% | 3.4 | 2.9 | 2.4 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 14 | 82 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 46% | 0% | 8.2 | 8.2 | 8.2 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20% | 0% | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 3 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 15% | 0% | 1.0 | 1.0 | 1.0 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 4 | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19% | 0% | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 28 | 107 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 18 | 0 | 56% | 10% | 26.5 | 25.5 | 24.5 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 11 | 40 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 71% | 4% | 13.9 | 13.4 | 12.9 |
| 2025 W10 | vs | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 21% | 3% | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.4 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 6 | 16 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 32% | 6% | 2.7 | 2.2 | 1.7 |
| 2025 W8 | @ | 11 | 61 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 26 | 0 | 42% | 11% | 11.7 | 10.2 | 8.7 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 6 | 17 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -2 | 0 | 34% | 4% | 2.5 | 2.0 | 1.5 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 3 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -4 | 0 | 18% | 4% | 1.7 | 1.2 | 0.7 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 8 | 44 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 37 | 0 | 30% | 8% | 11.1 | 9.6 | 8.1 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 6 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 23% | 0% | 2.5 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4% | 0% | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 34 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 3.6 | RB45 (5.8) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 4.2 | RB51 (3.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 6.9 | RB39 (8.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 9.5 | RB75 (0.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | FLEX | 10.3 | RB65 (1.0) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 10.1 | RB69 (1.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 8.3 | RB3 (26.5) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 6.8 | RB19 (13.9) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 6.1 | RB57 (1.4) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 8.2 | RB47 (2.7) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade