
Why: limited usage, tough matchup
vs DEN: allows 16.9 PPR/g to RB, rank 32/32 (Tough). Trailing RB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Trevor Lawrence. 2025 share of pass targets to RB (78/539). Descriptive context, never a model input.
2026 Week 1 consensus PPR projection (RB32), from tank01 getNFLProjections (consensus, PPR). Descriptive draft-prep context, not a start/sit call.
No prior games vs DEN in the record.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
RBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
He was replaced by Bhayshul Tuten on the roster in 2025 and was traded to the Philadelphia Eagles after one week.
source ↗He was replaced by Bhayshul Tuten on the roster in 2025 and was traded to the Philadelphia Eagles after one week.
source ↗| Week | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 W1 | vs | 15 | 66 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 22 | 0 | 0% | 5% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W18 | vs | 5 | 23 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 26% | 0% | 8.3 | 8.3 | 8.3 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 1 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 16 | 1 | 18% | 4% | 9.3 | 8.8 | 8.3 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 2 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3% | 0% | -1.5 | -1.5 | -1.5 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 8 | 17 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 29% | 4% | 8.9 | 8.4 | 7.9 |
| 2025 W12 | @ | 7 | 17 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21% | 3% | 1.7 | 1.7 | 1.7 |
| 2025 W11 | vs | 15 | 74 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32% | 0% | 13.4 | 13.4 | 13.4 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 4 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 27% | 9% | 2.0 | 1.5 | 1.0 |
| 2025 W9 | @ | 9 | 29 | 1 | 1 | 1 | -3 | 0 | 25% | 3% | 9.6 | 9.1 | 8.6 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 5 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29% | 0% | 2.2 | 2.2 | 2.2 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 2 | 14 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 14 | 0 | 14% | 7% | 4.8 | 3.8 | 2.8 |
| 2025 W5 | vs | 4 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 21% | 4% | 2.1 | 1.6 | 1.1 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 4 | 14 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 24% | 3% | 3.2 | 2.7 | 2.2 |
| 2025 W3 | vs | 6 | 21 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17% | 3% | 8.1 | 8.1 | 8.1 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 8 | 42 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 32 | 1 | 25% | 5% | – | – | – |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 3 | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6% | 0% | – | – | – |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 13 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 5.5 | RB25 (8.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 6.5 | RB31 (9.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W14 | SIT | 6.5 | RB84 (-1.5) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 6.8 | RB40 (8.9) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 7.3 | RB53 (1.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 4.8 | RB20 (13.4) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 4.3 | RB53 (2.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 4.5 | RB23 (9.6) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W7 | SIT | 4.2 | RB55 (2.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W6 | SIT | 6.2 | RB41 (4.8) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade