
Why: limited usage
vs ATL: allows 21.4 PPR/g to RB, rank 18/32 (Average). Trailing RB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
No prior games vs ATL in the record.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 10.
RBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W15 | vs | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3% | 0% | 0.4 |
| 2025 W14 | @ | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6% | 0% | 0.4 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7% | 0% | 0.3 |
| 2025 W11 | vs | 5 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12% | 0% | 1.5 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8% | 0% | 0.3 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 1 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 8% | 3% | 2.3 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 6 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19% | 0% | 1.5 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 6 | 22 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21% | 5% | 2.2 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3% | 0% | – |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 1 | -2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4% | 0% | – |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Small sample: 8 graded calls. Read this as directional, not a reliable rate yet.
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade