
Why: limited usage, low total
vs TEN: allows 21.4 PPR/g to RB, rank 17/32 (Average). Trailing RB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
| Game | As | Site | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W2 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
RBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W17 | vs | 3 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 13% | 3% | 3.0 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 3 | 8 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 52 | 0 | 36% | 12% | 10.0 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 9 | 58 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 38% | 3% | 13.5 |
| 2025 W14 | vs | 2 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24% | 0% | 2.2 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12% | 3% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W12 | @ | 4 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 29% | 0% | 0.7 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 2 | 11 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 28% | 4% | 1.1 |
| 2025 W10 | vs | 3 | 10 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 29% | 9% | 2.1 |
| 2025 W8 | @ | 7 | 65 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 44 | 0 | 46% | 17% | 17.9 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 2 | 10 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 22 | 0 | 48% | 13% | 5.2 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 26% | 7% | 1.1 |
| 2025 W5 | vs | 1 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 3 | 28 | 0 | 40% | 10% | 6.3 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 3 | 9 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 18 | 0 | 33% | 7% | 4.7 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 0 | 21% | 14% | 1.6 |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 2 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13% | 0% | 1.8 |
| 2024 W18 | vs | 4 | 41 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13% | 0% | 4.1 |
| 2024 W17 | @ | 3 | 35 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 | 22% | 3% | 5.3 |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 31 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 4.9 | RB54 (3.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 4.2 | RB30 (10.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 2.2 | RB17 (13.5) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W14 | SIT | 3.1 | RB58 (2.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 5.5 | RB96 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | 6.1 | RB55 (0.7) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 6.1 | RB63 (1.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 6.9 | RB52 (2.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W8 | SIT | 5.8 | RB11 (17.9) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W7 | SIT | 4.9 | RB41 (5.2) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade