
Why: limited usage
vs PHI: allows 22.7 PPR/g to RB, rank 12/32 (Average). Trailing RB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Small sample (2 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
RBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | @ | 13 | 29 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 36% | 0% | 2.9 |
| 2025 W17 | vs | 11 | 105 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 64% | 0% | 22.5 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 8 | 25 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20% | 0% | 8.5 |
| 2025 W15 | @ | 18 | 96 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 52% | 0% | 15.6 |
| 2025 W14 | @ | 7 | 32 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19% | 0% | 3.2 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 4 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14% | 0% | 2.0 |
| 2025 W11 | @ | 9 | 28 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 27% | 3% | 4.3 |
| 2025 W10 | vs | 11 | 30 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 44% | 0% | 3.0 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 12 | 38 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 46% | 5% | 5.1 |
| 2025 W8 | @ | 9 | 25 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 57% | 3% | 2.5 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 13 | 33 | 0 | 2 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 49% | 7% | 4.2 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 17 | 61 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 66% | 4% | 5.8 |
| 2025 W5 | @ | 14 | 111 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 39 | 0 | 47% | 9% | 27.0 |
| 2025 W4 | @ | 7 | 47 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 0 | 35% | 8% | 7.7 |
| 2025 W3 | vs | 8 | 26 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 40% | 6% | 10.1 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 4 | 17 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 22% | 3% | – |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 10 | 82 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 33% | 3% | – |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 15 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | FLEX | 9.3 | RB60 (2.9) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 6.5 | RB7 (22.5) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | 5.9 | RB35 (8.5) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | SIT | 5.2 | RB15 (15.6) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W14 | SIT | 5.8 | RB51 (3.2) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 6.7 | RB64 (2.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 7.8 | RB46 (4.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 8.3 | RB48 (3.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | FLEX | 11.0 | RB38 (5.1) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W8 | FLEX | 10.1 | RB50 (2.5) | ✗ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade