
Why: limited usage
vs TB: allows 31.2 PPR/g to WR, rank 14/32 (Average). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
No prior games vs TB in the record.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 11.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
No availability flags or recent headlines.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 3% | 0% | 0.9 |
| 2025 W17 | vs | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | – | – | 10% | 3% | 1.5 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7% | 0% | 0.1 |
| 2025 W13 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 12% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W12 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 0% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W11 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 0% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 0% | 0% | -2.0 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 3% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W8 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 2% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 0% | 0% | – |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 2% | 0% | – |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Small sample: 9 graded calls. Read this as directional, not a reliable rate yet.
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade