
Why: form-driven
vs KC: allows 19.1 PPR/g to RB, rank 27/32 (Tough). Trailing RB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Small sample (2 games). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
RBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
Dobbins signed a two-year extension, RB RJ Harvey remains, and fourth-round draft pick RB Jonah Coleman joins the team. Lou Scataglia believes that leaves sophomore running back RJ Harvey well-positioned for that dual-threat role.
source ↗| Week | Opp | Car | RuYd | RuTD | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs | 15 | 28 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 0 | 56% | 17% | 4.3 |
| 2025 W17 | @ | 14 | 43 | 0 | 6 | 5 | 33 | 1 | 65% | 16% | 18.6 |
| 2025 W16 | vs | 7 | 50 | 1 | 5 | 4 | 71 | 0 | 59% | 11% | 22.1 |
| 2025 W15 | vs | 19 | 65 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 68% | 3% | 10.5 |
| 2025 W14 | @ | 17 | 75 | 1 | 6 | 6 | 25 | 0 | 68% | 18% | 22.0 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 13 | 35 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 27 | 0 | 47% | 10% | 21.2 |
| 2025 W11 | vs | 11 | 30 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 20 | 0 | 61% | 9% | 8.0 |
| 2025 W10 | vs | 4 | 9 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 9 | 0 | 28% | 12% | 3.8 |
| 2025 W9 | @ | 2 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 5 | 51 | 1 | 32% | 15% | 16.6 |
| 2025 W8 | vs | 7 | 46 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 27% | 4% | 24.1 |
| 2025 W7 | vs | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 25% | 4% | 7.2 |
| 2025 W6 | @ | 2 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 21 | 0 | 28% | 15% | 6.5 |
| 2025 W5 | @ | 4 | 12 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 18 | 0 | 20% | 8% | 6.0 |
| 2025 W4 | vs | 14 | 58 | 0 | 5 | 4 | 40 | 1 | 41% | 12% | 19.8 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 14 | 0 | 29% | 13% | 4.6 |
| 2025 W2 | @ | 5 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 16 | 0 | 33% | 7% | – |
| 2025 W1 | vs | 6 | 70 | 0 | 1 | 1 | -1 | 0 | 29% | 3% | – |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Based on 15 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | START | 15.9 | RB51 (4.3) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W17 | START | 15.4 | RB11 (18.6) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | START | 14.3 | RB11 (22.1) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W15 | FLEX | 11.8 | RB25 (10.5) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W14 | FLEX | 10.6 | RB4 (22.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | 10.4 | RB2 (21.2) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W11 | SIT | 8.2 | RB37 (8.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | FLEX | 9.5 | RB46 (3.8) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 7.1 | RB11 (16.6) | ✗ | |
| 2025 W8 | FLEX | 8.6 | RB6 (24.1) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade