
Why: low total
vs TEN: allows 19.0 PPR/g to QB, rank 5/32 (Soft). Trailing QB PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
No prior games vs TEN in the record.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 11.
QBschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | C/A | Pass | PaTD | INT | RuYd | RuTD | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W18 | @ | 16/31 | 170 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 7.0 |
| 2023 W18 | vs | 12/30 | 88 | 0 | 2 | 13 | 0 | – |
| 2023 W17 | @ | 16/26 | 209 | 0 | 3 | 37 | 1 | – |
| 2023 W16 | @ | 25/33 | 256 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | – |
| 2023 W15 | vs | 23/31 | 180 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | – |
| 2023 W14 | @ | 19/28 | 240 | 3 | 1 | 13 | 0 | – |
| 2023 W13 | vs | 13/25 | 141 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 0 | – |
| 2023 W12 | @ | 9/14 | 54 | 0 | 1 | – | – | – |
| 2023 W10 | vs | 3/7 | 25 | 0 | 1 | – | – | – |
| 2023 W5 | vs | 3/9 | 22 | 0 | 0 | – | – | – |
| 2023 W4 | @ | 4/9 | 57 | 0 | 0 | – | – | – |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Small sample: 1 graded call. Read this as directional, not a reliable rate yet.
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade