
Why: limited usage, low total, tough matchup
vs SF: allows 32.1 PPR/g to WR, rank 13/32 (Average). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Tua Tagovailoa. 2025 share of pass targets to WR (242/445). Descriptive context, never a model input.
No prior games vs SF in the record.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Car | RuYd | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W14 | @ | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | – | – | 32% | 3% | 1.4 | 0.9 | 0.4 |
| 2024 W13 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 28% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 W12 | vs | 4 | 2 | 20 | 0 | – | – | 30% | 11% | 4.0 | 3.0 | 2.0 |
| 2024 W11 | vs | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 19% | 3% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 W10 | vs | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 31% | 6% | -0.2 | -0.2 | -0.2 |
| 2024 W9 | @ | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 33% | 8% | 1.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 |
| 2024 W8 | vs | 2 | 2 | 35 | 0 | – | – | 30% | 7% | 5.5 | 4.5 | 3.5 |
| 2024 W7 | @ | 1 | 1 | 41 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 23% | 3% | 3.0 | 2.5 | 2.0 |
| 2023 W18 | vs | 5 | 1 | 33 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 82% | 20% | – | – | – |
| 2023 W17 | @ | 3 | 1 | 39 | 0 | – | – | 68% | 14% | – | – | – |
| 2023 W16 | @ | 2 | 2 | 33 | 0 | – | – | 86% | 8% | – | – | – |
| 2023 W15 | vs | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 55% | 8% | – | – | – |
| 2023 W14 | @ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 35% | 4% | – | – | – |
| 2023 W13 | vs | 1 | 1 | 11 | 0 | – | – | 9% | 7% | – | – | – |
| 2023 W10 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 1% | 0% | – | – | – |
| 2023 W9 | vs | 6 | 1 | 11 | 0 | – | – | 77% | 14% | – | – | – |
| 2023 W8 | @ | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | – | – | 58% | 8% | – | – | – |
| 2023 W7 | vs | 1 | 1 | 11 | 0 | – | – | 42% | 3% | – | – | – |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Small sample: 8 graded calls. Read this as directional, not a reliable rate yet.
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade