
Why: limited usage, tough matchup
vs NYG: allows 33.4 PPR/g to WR, rank 9/32 (Soft). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W2. Descriptive context, never a model input.
Primary passer Matthew Stafford. 2025 share of pass targets to WR (364/578). Descriptive context, never a model input.
| Game | As | Site | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W17 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Small sample (1 game). Defense roster/scheme turnover means the unit from prior seasons may differ significantly. Descriptive context only, never a model input or driver of the start/sit call.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR | Half | Std |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W17 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 20% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W16 | @ | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 17% | 5% | 1.3 | 0.8 | 0.3 |
| 2025 W13 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W12 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W10 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W9 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W7 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W6 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W5 | @ | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 12% | 3% | 1.9 | 1.4 | 0.9 |
| 2025 W3 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W2 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2025 W1 | @ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3% | 3% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 W9 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 W8 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 W7 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 46% | 0% | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 2024 W6 | vs | 3 | 3 | 31 | 0 | 43% | 8% | 6.1 | 4.6 | 3.1 |
| 2024 W5 | @ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1% | 0% | – | – | – |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Based on 17 graded calls.
| Week | Opp | Call | Proj | Finish | Hit |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 W18 | SIT | 0.1 | WR116 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W17 | SIT | 0.3 | WR125 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W16 | SIT | -0.9 | WR112 (1.3) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W13 | SIT | -0.5 | WR115 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W12 | SIT | -0.1 | WR104 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W10 | SIT | 0.0 | WR108 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W9 | SIT | 0.6 | WR108 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W7 | SIT | -0.1 | WR112 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W6 | SIT | 0.9 | WR107 (0.0) | ✓ | |
| 2025 W5 | SIT | 0.1 | WR91 (1.9) | ✓ |
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade