
Why: limited usage
vs DAL: allows 39.2 PPR/g to WR, rank 1/32 (Soft). Trailing WR PPR allowed per game, weeks before 2026 W1. Descriptive context, never a model input.
No prior games vs DAL in the record.
Snap %, target share and opportunities are descriptive usage: how the offense has deployed this player, not a forecast. Weeks shown: most recent 16.
WRschedule vs the rest of the league: 100 = league-average, >100 softer, <100 tougher; rank 1 = easiest of 32. Projected on 2025 defense. low-confidence early-season estimate. Descriptive context, not a start/sit call.
| Week | Opp | Tgt | Rec | ReYd | ReTD | Snap% | Tgt% | PPR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 W14 | vs | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 14% | 2% | 1.1 |
| 2024 W13 | @ | 2 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 20% | 5% | 1.9 |
| 2024 W12 | vs | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25% | 8% | 0.0 |
| 2024 W11 | vs | 4 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 24% | 11% | 3.3 |
| 2024 W10 | @ | 2 | 2 | 17 | 0 | 32% | 7% | 3.7 |
| 2024 W9 | @ | 3 | 3 | 15 | 0 | 20% | 11% | 4.5 |
| 2024 W8 | vs | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 17% | 0% | 0.0 |
| 2024 W7 | @ | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16% | 10% | 0.0 |
| 2024 W5 | @ | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14% | 3% | 0.0 |
| 2023 W17 | vs | 1 | 1 | 33 | 0 | 32% | 5% | – |
| 2023 W16 | @ | 3 | 2 | 13 | 0 | 54% | 9% | – |
| 2023 W15 | @ | 3 | 1 | 14 | 0 | 54% | 13% | – |
| 2023 W14 | vs | 10 | 4 | 97 | 1 | 53% | 25% | – |
| 2023 W12 | @ | 5 | 3 | 34 | 0 | 32% | 17% | – |
| 2023 W11 | vs | 7 | 4 | 116 | 0 | 35% | 30% | – |
| 2023 W10 | vs | 2 | 1 | 40 | 1 | 33% | 9% | – |
| 2023 W9 | vs | 7 | 5 | 56 | 1 | 46% | 22% | – |
| 2023 W8 | @ | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 57% | 15% | – |
Descriptive per-week usage and PPR output. Situational PBP cuts (red-zone, 3rd-down) and EPA/touch are planned for v2.
Loading full history…
Small sample: 9 graded calls. Read this as directional, not a reliable rate yet.
✓ and ✗ grade where a player finished, not his points: a call hits when he finished startable (top-24 RB/WR, top-12 QB/TE), even if he came in under his projection. How we grade